Literature DB >> 17161622

3D pattern of brain abnormalities in Fragile X syndrome visualized using tensor-based morphometry.

Agatha D Lee1, Alex D Leow, Allen Lu, Allan L Reiss, Scott Hall, Ming-Chang Chiang, Arthur W Toga, Paul M Thompson.   

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FraX), a genetic neurodevelopmental disorder, results in impaired cognition with particular deficits in executive function and visuo-spatial skills. Here we report the first detailed 3D maps of the effects of the Fragile X mutation on brain structure, using tensor-based morphometry. TBM visualizes structural brain deficits automatically, without time-consuming specification of regions-of-interest. We compared 36 subjects with FraX (age: 14.66+/-1.58 S.D., 18 females/18 males), and 33 age-matched healthy controls (age: 14.67+/-2.2 S.D., 17 females/16 males), using high-dimensional elastic image registration. All 69 subjects' 3D T1-weighted brain MRIs were spatially deformed to match a high-resolution single-subject average MRI scan in ICBM space, whose geometry was optimized to produce a minimal deformation target. Maps of the local Jacobian determinant (expansion factor) were computed from the deformation fields. Statistical maps showed increased caudate (10% higher; p = 0.001) and lateral ventricle volumes (19% higher; p = 0.003), and trend-level parietal and temporal white matter excesses (10% higher locally; p = 0.04). In affected females, volume abnormalities correlated with reduction in systemically measured levels of the Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP; Spearman's r < -0.5 locally). Decreased FMRP correlated with ventricular expansion (p = 0.042; permutation test), and anterior cingulate tissue reductions (p = 0.0026; permutation test) supporting theories that FMRP is required for normal dendritic pruning in fronto-striatal-limbic pathways. No sex differences were found; findings were confirmed using traditional volumetric measures in regions of interest. Deficit patterns were replicated by performing statistics after logarithmic transformation, which may be more appropriate for tensor-valued data. Investigation of how these anomalies emerge over time will accelerate our understanding of FraX and its treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17161622      PMCID: PMC1995408          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  76 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance image tissue classification using a partial volume model.

Authors:  D W Shattuck; S R Sandor-Leahy; K A Schaper; D A Rottenberg; R M Leahy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Voxel-based morphometry--the methods.

Authors:  J Ashburner; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  A unified statistical approach to deformation-based morphometry.

Authors:  M K Chung; K J Worsley; T Paus; C Cherif; D L Collins; J N Giedd; J L Rapoport; A C Evans
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Regional spatial normalization: toward an optimal target.

Authors:  P Kochunov; J L Lancaster; P Thompson; R Woods; J Mazziotta; J Hardies; P Fox
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Imaging of onset and progression of Alzheimer's disease with voxel-compression mapping of serial magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  N C Fox; W R Crum; R I Scahill; J M Stevens; J C Janssen; M N Rossor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Brain anatomy, gender and IQ in children and adolescents with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  S Eliez; C M Blasey; L S Freund; T Hastie; A L Reiss
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Functional brain activation during cognition is related to FMR1 gene expression.

Authors:  V Menon; H Kwon; S Eliez; A K Taylor; A L Reiss
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-09-22       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Growth patterns in the developing brain detected by using continuum mechanical tensor maps.

Authors:  P M Thompson; J N Giedd; R P Woods; D MacDonald; A C Evans; A W Toga
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Dendritic spine structural anomalies in fragile-X mental retardation syndrome.

Authors:  S A Irwin; R Galvez; W T Greenough
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Voxel-based morphometry using the RAVENS maps: methods and validation using simulated longitudinal atrophy.

Authors:  C Davatzikos; A Genc; D Xu; S M Resnick
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  46 in total

1.  Differentiating prenatal exposure to methamphetamine and alcohol versus alcohol and not methamphetamine using tensor-based brain morphometry and discriminant analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Sowell; Alex D Leow; Susan Y Bookheimer; Lynne M Smith; Mary J O'Connor; Eric Kan; Carly Rosso; Suzanne Houston; Ivo D Dinov; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Imaging genomics.

Authors:  Paul M Thompson; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 3.  Moving Toward Integrative, Multidimensional Research in Modern Psychiatry: Lessons Learned From Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Lawrence K Fung; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Optimization of the SNR-resolution tradeoff for registration of magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Shoan C Kale; Jason P Lerch; R Mark Henkelman; X Josette Chen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Brain mapping as a tool to study neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Liana G Apostolova; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.620

6.  Structural consequences of diffuse traumatic brain injury: a large deformation tensor-based morphometry study.

Authors:  Junghoon Kim; Brian Avants; Sunil Patel; John Whyte; Branch H Coslett; John Pluta; John A Detre; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Outcome measures for clinical trials in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; David Hessl; Leonard Abbeduto; Allan L Reiss; Andrea Beckel-Mitchener; Tiina K Urv
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.225

Review 8.  Gene, brain, and behavior relationships in fragile X syndrome: evidence from neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Amy A Lightbody; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2009

9.  Three-dimensional brain growth abnormalities in childhood-onset schizophrenia visualized by using tensor-based morphometry.

Authors:  Nitin Gogtay; Allen Lu; Alex D Leow; Andrea D Klunder; Agatha D Lee; Alex Chavez; Deanna Greenstein; Jay N Giedd; Arthur W Toga; Judith L Rapoport; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Mapping the regional influence of genetics on brain structure variability--a tensor-based morphometry study.

Authors:  Caroline C Brun; Natasha Leporé; Xavier Pennec; Agatha D Lee; Marina Barysheva; Sarah K Madsen; Christina Avedissian; Yi-Yu Chou; Greig I de Zubicaray; Katie L McMahon; Margaret J Wright; Arthur W Toga; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.