Literature DB >> 17161302

Animal models to test respiratory allergy of low molecular weight chemicals: a guidance.

Josje H E Arts1, C Frieke Kuper.   

Abstract

At present, there are no widely applied or fully validated test methods to identify respiratory LMW allergens, i.e. compounds that are considered capable of inducing allergic asthma. Most tests have been investigated using strong respiratory allergens. Moreover, they are meant to detect the potential of a chemical to induce respiratory sensitisation at relatively high doses. Consequently, the sensitivity of the tests is not well-known, and they do not provide information on low doses such as generally found in occupational situations, and on threshold levels to be used in risk assessment. In addition, the various test methods use different application routes, i.e. intradermal, topical or inhalation exposure, and different parameters. Therefore standardised and validated dose-response test methods are urgently required in order to be able to identify respiratory allergens and to recommend safe exposure levels for consumers and workers. In the present paper, methods or testing strategies are described to detect respiratory sensitisation and/or allergy. Overall, assays that utilize only an induction phase may serve as indicators of respiratory sensitisation potential whereas assays that use both an induction and an elicitation or challenge phase may provide information on potency and presence of thresholds. The dermal route as sensitisation route has the advantage of the respiratory tract not being exposed to the allergen prior to challenge which facilitates the distinction between irritant and allergic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17161302     DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  6 in total

1.  Modeling and insights into molecular basis of low molecular weight respiratory sensitizers.

Authors:  Xueyan Cui; Rui Yang; Siwen Li; Juan Liu; Qiuyun Wu; Xiao Li
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.943

Review 2.  Methyl methacrylate and respiratory sensitization: a critical review.

Authors:  Jonathan Borak; Cheryl Fields; Larry S Andrews; Mark A Pemberton
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Mapping Chemical Respiratory Sensitization: How Useful Are Our Current Computational Tools?

Authors:  Emily Golden; Mikhail Maertens; Thomas Hartung; Alexandra Maertens
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; Paul D Siegel; B J Meade
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-06-16

Review 5.  Toluene diisocyanate (TDI) airway effects and dose-responses in different animal models.

Authors:  Thomas Schupp; Michael A Collins
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.068

6.  Setting Occupational Exposure Limits for Chemical Allergens--Understanding the Challenges.

Authors:  G S Dotson; A Maier; P D Siegel; S E Anderson; B J Green; A B Stefaniak; C D Codispoti; I Kimber
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.