PURPOSE: Research on the measurement of HIV risk demonstrates that interview mode can affect reporting; however, few studies have applied these findings to assessments of hormonal contraceptive use. This paper examines how audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) influenced reports of hormonal contraceptive use and pregnancy among Zimbabwean women. METHODS: Using a prospective, randomized, cross-over design, we compared self-reports obtained with ACASI and face-to-face (FTF) interview among 655 women enrolled in a prospective study on hormonal contraceptive use and HIV acquisition. In addition, self-report data were compared to those collected during clinical exams. RESULTS: Compared to FTF interviews, reports of hormonal contraceptive use were lower in ACASI [odds ratio (OR)=0.6; 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=0.5-0.6], and reports of pregnancy were higher (OR=1.5; 95% CI=1.1-1.9). Both modes of self-report differed from records on contraceptive method disbursement. CONCLUSION: Although ACASI yielded higher reports of several reproductive health behaviors, discrepancies between self-reports and clinical data on method disbursement highlight persistent measurement challenges.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Research on the measurement of HIV risk demonstrates that interview mode can affect reporting; however, few studies have applied these findings to assessments of hormonal contraceptive use. This paper examines how audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) influenced reports of hormonal contraceptive use and pregnancy among Zimbabwean women. METHODS: Using a prospective, randomized, cross-over design, we compared self-reports obtained with ACASI and face-to-face (FTF) interview among 655 women enrolled in a prospective study on hormonal contraceptive use and HIV acquisition. In addition, self-report data were compared to those collected during clinical exams. RESULTS: Compared to FTF interviews, reports of hormonal contraceptive use were lower in ACASI [odds ratio (OR)=0.6; 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=0.5-0.6], and reports of pregnancy were higher (OR=1.5; 95% CI=1.1-1.9). Both modes of self-report differed from records on contraceptive method disbursement. CONCLUSION: Although ACASI yielded higher reports of several reproductive health behaviors, discrepancies between self-reports and clinical data on method disbursement highlight persistent measurement challenges.
Authors: Paul C Hewett; Barbara S Mensch; Manoel Carlos S de A Ribeiro; Heidi E Jones; Sheri A Lippman; Mark R Montgomery; Janneke H H M van de Wijgert Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-06-04 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Barbara S Mensch; Paul C Hewett; Heidi E Jones; Carla Gianni Luppi; Sheri A Lippman; Adriana A Pinho; Juan Diaz Journal: Int Fam Plan Perspect Date: 2008-12
Authors: Alexandra M Minnis; Markus J Steiner; Maria F Gallo; Lee Warner; Marcia M Hobbs; Ariane van der Straten; Tsungai Chipato; Maurizio Macaluso; Nancy S Padian Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-09-09 Impact factor: 4.897