BACKGROUND: Vena cava filter insertion (VCF) is traditionally performed in a radiology suite or in the operating room. We reviewed our experience of bedside VCF insertion in the intensive care unit (ICU) performed by general surgeons. METHODS: A prospective, observational study of bedside VCF insertion in the ICU was performed by general surgeons between February 1996 and June 2005. Demographic data and procedural complications were recorded. RESULTS: Four hundred three patients underwent bedside VCF insertion. Complications included 1 groin hematoma, 2 misplacements, and a right ventricular perforation from a dilator requiring surgical repair. DVT occurred in 38 patients (8.5%); 14 occurred at the insertion site. There were 2 pulmonary embolisms (<1%) after VCF. Contrast-related renal failure occurred in 2 of the first 35 patients; carbon dioxide gas is now used for contrast in high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside insertion of VCF in the ICU by surgeons is safe and effective.
BACKGROUND: Vena cava filter insertion (VCF) is traditionally performed in a radiology suite or in the operating room. We reviewed our experience of bedside VCF insertion in the intensive care unit (ICU) performed by general surgeons. METHODS: A prospective, observational study of bedside VCF insertion in the ICU was performed by general surgeons between February 1996 and June 2005. Demographic data and procedural complications were recorded. RESULTS: Four hundred three patients underwent bedside VCF insertion. Complications included 1 groin hematoma, 2 misplacements, and a right ventricular perforation from a dilator requiring surgical repair. DVT occurred in 38 patients (8.5%); 14 occurred at the insertion site. There were 2 pulmonary embolisms (<1%) after VCF. Contrast-related renal failure occurred in 2 of the first 35 patients; carbon dioxide gas is now used for contrast in high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside insertion of VCF in the ICU by surgeons is safe and effective.