BACKGROUND: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) are frequently used in diagnosing and monitoring patients with heart failure. Recent studies have demonstrated that concentrations of these peptides are decreased in obese patients, but whether lower natriuretic peptide concentrations are really due to different hemodynamics is unknown. The relationship between these markers and left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in obesity has not been elucidated. METHODS: We examined patients undergoing cardiac catheterization who had creatinine of < 2.0, no evidence of myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolism, and no cardiac transplant. Body mass index and LVEDP were determined, and BNP and NT-proBNP obtained at the start of each case. Obesity was defined as body mass index of > or = 30 kg/m2. RESULTS: Of 203 patients enrolled, 101 were obese. The groups were similar in respect to race, creatinine, cholesterol, and history of dyslipidemia and cardiomyopathy. The obese patients tended to be younger, were more likely to have diabetes and hypertension, and were less likely to have coronary artery disease. The obese patients had higher LVEDP but reduced BNP and NT-pro-BNP. The relationship between the natriuretic peptides and LVEDP was poor, with r values of < 0.1. CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients have reduced concentrations of BNP and NT-proBNP compared to nonobese patients despite having elevated LVEDP. This suggests that factors other than cardiac status impact on BNP and NT-proBNP concentrations. The poor relationship between natriuretic peptide concentrations and LVEDP also suggests that these concentrations should not be considered surrogates for cardiac filling pressures or volumes.
BACKGROUND:B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) are frequently used in diagnosing and monitoring patients with heart failure. Recent studies have demonstrated that concentrations of these peptides are decreased in obesepatients, but whether lower natriuretic peptide concentrations are really due to different hemodynamics is unknown. The relationship between these markers and left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in obesity has not been elucidated. METHODS: We examined patients undergoing cardiac catheterization who had creatinine of < 2.0, no evidence of myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolism, and no cardiac transplant. Body mass index and LVEDP were determined, and BNP and NT-proBNP obtained at the start of each case. Obesity was defined as body mass index of > or = 30 kg/m2. RESULTS: Of 203 patients enrolled, 101 were obese. The groups were similar in respect to race, creatinine, cholesterol, and history of dyslipidemia and cardiomyopathy. The obesepatients tended to be younger, were more likely to have diabetes and hypertension, and were less likely to have coronary artery disease. The obesepatients had higher LVEDP but reduced BNP and NT-pro-BNP. The relationship between the natriuretic peptides and LVEDP was poor, with r values of < 0.1. CONCLUSIONS:Obesepatients have reduced concentrations of BNP and NT-proBNP compared to nonobese patients despite having elevated LVEDP. This suggests that factors other than cardiac status impact on BNP and NT-proBNP concentrations. The poor relationship between natriuretic peptide concentrations and LVEDP also suggests that these concentrations should not be considered surrogates for cardiac filling pressures or volumes.
Authors: Eric M Changchien; Shushmita Ahmed; Francesca Betti; Jennifer Higa; Kate Kiely; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; John Morton Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Juliana Jensen; Li-Ping Ma; Michael L X Fu; David Svaninger; Per-Arne Lundberg; Ola Hammarsten Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2010-03-13 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Pratik Choksy; Harry C Davis; James Januzzi; Julian Thayer; Gregory Harshfield; Vincent J B Robinson; Gaston K Kapuku Journal: Am J Med Sci Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 2.378
Authors: Annabel Chen-Tournoux; Abigail May Khan; Aaron L Baggish; Victor M Castro; Marc J Semigran; Elizabeth L McCabe; George Moukarbel; Jason Reingold; Sofia Durrani; Gregory D Lewis; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Lee M Kaplan; Thomas J Wang Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Sahera Dirajlal-Fargo; Bruce Kinley; Ying Jiang; Chris T Longenecker; Corrilynn O Hileman; Sara Debanne; Grace A McComsey Journal: AIDS Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Chiadi E Ndumele; Kunihiro Matsushita; Yingying Sang; Mariana Lazo; Sunil K Agarwal; Vijay Nambi; Anita Deswal; Roger S Blumenthal; Christie M Ballantyne; Josef Coresh; Elizabeth Selvin Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Seung Jei Park; Kyoung Im Cho; Sun Jae Jung; Sung Won Choi; Jae Won Choi; Dong Won Lee; Hyeon Gook Lee; Tae Ik Kim Journal: Korean Circ J Date: 2009-12-30 Impact factor: 3.243