Literature DB >> 17160572

Prospective evaluation of quality of life and sexual functioning after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.

S O Breukink1, H J van der Zaag-Loonen, E M C Bouma, J P E N Pierie, C Hoff, T Wiggers, W J H J Meijerink.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate how the quality of life of patients with rectal cancer changes with time after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.
METHODS: Patients completed the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire and a colorectal-specific European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire before laparoscopic total mesorectal excision, on discharge from the hospital and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Patients were treated by laparoscopic low anterior resection or laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (mean age, 64 years; 29 males (57 percent)) participated in this study, of whom 38 (75 percent) underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection and 13 (25 percent) laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. Compared with preoperative scores on the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36, patients reported a deterioration in physical functioning (74 vs. 80; P = 0.009), and improved mental functioning (76 vs. 70; P = 0.007) at three months. Improvement in emotional well-being was reported both on the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (78 vs. 53; P = 0.006) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (84 vs. 69; P < 0.001). At one year, improvements in global quality of life (82 vs. 68; P = 0.001) and symptoms, such as fatigue (18 vs. 32; P < 0.001), pain (5 vs. 12; P = 0.009), and appetite loss (3 vs. 13; P = 0.01), were reported. Sexual functioning was worse from three months onward until one year after surgery (47 vs. 66; P = 0.004). Patients who underwent low anterior resection experienced less sexual dysfunction than patients after abdominoperineal resection (21 vs. 56; P = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: One year after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer, patients reported improvement in some important quality of life outcomes, including global quality of life, despite a decrease in sexual functioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17160572     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-006-0791-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  16 in total

1.  Impact of a laparoscopic resection on the quality of life in rectal cancer patients: results of 135 patients.

Authors:  Jun Li; Rong Chen; Yong-Qiang Xu; Xiao-Chen Wang; Shu Zheng; Su-Zhan Zhang; Ke-Feng Ding
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Transanal endoscopic video-assisted (TEVA) excision.

Authors:  Madhu Ragupathi; Dominique Vande Maele; Javier Nieto; T Bartley Pickron; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: where do we stand?

Authors:  Mukta K Krane; Alessandro Fichera
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Laparoscopic resection of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors with special contribution of radionuclide imaging.

Authors:  Andreas Shamiyeh; Michael Gabriel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Is there any role for minimally invasive surgery in NET?

Authors:  M Thomaschewski; H Neeff; T Keck; H P H Neumann; T Strate; E von Dobschuetz
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  Robotic-assisted proctectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: a case-matched comparison of laparoscopic and robotic technique.

Authors:  Aaron T Miller; Julia R Berian; Michele Rubin; Roger D Hurst; Alessandro Fichera; Konstantin Umanskiy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Urinary and sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Marilyne M Lange; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Outcomes of Local Excision plus Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with T1 Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Suzuki; Sotaro Sadahiro; Akira Tanaka; Kazutake Okada; Gota Saito; Hiroshi Miyakita; Takeshi Akiba; Hiroshi Yamamuro
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.935

9.  Prospective evaluation of health-related quality of life after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer.

Authors:  G E Theodoropoulos; T Karantanos; P Stamopoulos; G Zografos
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Quality of life in stoma patients: appropriate and inappropriate stoma sites.

Authors:  B Mahjoubi; K Kiani Goodarzi; H Mohammad-Sadeghi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.