Literature DB >> 17160439

Ambient aerosol and its carbon content in Gainesville, a mid-scale city in Florida.

Paradee Chuaybamroong1, Kimberleigh Cayse, Chang-Yu Wu, Dale A Lundgren.   

Abstract

Ambient aerosols were collected during 2000-2001 in Gainesville, Florida, using a micro-orifice uniform deposit impactor (MOUDI) to study mass size distribution and carbon composition. A bimodal mass distribution was found in every sample with major peaks for aerosols ranging from 0.32 to 0.56 microm, and 3.2 to 5.6 microm in diameter. The two distributions represent the fine mode (<2.5 microm) and the coarse mode (>2.5 microm) of particle size. Averaged over all sites and seasons, coarse particles consisted of 15% carbon while fine particles consisted of 22% carbon. Considerable variation was noted between winter and summer seasons. Smoke from fireplaces in winter appeared to be an important factor for the carbon, especially the elemental carbon contribution. In summer, organic carbon was more abundant. The maximum secondary organic carbon was also found in this season (7.0 microg m(-3)), and the concentration is between those observed in urban areas (15-20 microg m(-3)) and in rural areas (4-5 microg m(-3)). However, unlike in large cities where photochemical activity of anthropogenic emissions are determinants of carbon composition, biogenic sources were likely the key factor in Gainesville. Other critical factors that affect the distribution, shape and concentration were precipitation, brushfire and wind.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17160439     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-9336-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   3.307


  6 in total

1.  Characterization of the Southwestern Desert Aerosol, Meadview, AZ.

Authors:  Barbara J Turpin; Pradeep Saxena; George Allen And Petros Koutrakis; Peter McMurry; Lynn Hildemann
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.235

2.  Pulmonary function changes in children associated with fine particulate matter.

Authors:  J Q Koenig; T V Larson; Q S Hanley; V Rebolledo; K Dumler; H Checkoway; S Z Wang; D Lin; W E Pierson
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Deposition and fate of aerosolized drugs.

Authors:  M T Newhouse; R E Ruffin
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Comparison and evaluation of chemically speciated mobile source PM2.5 particulate matter profiles.

Authors:  J A Gillies; A W Gertler
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Asthmatic responses to airborne acid aerosols.

Authors:  B D Ostro; M J Lipsett; M B Wiener; J C Selner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Air pollution and daily hospital admissions in metropolitan Los Angeles.

Authors:  W S Linn; Y Szlachcic; H Gong; P L Kinney; K T Berhane
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  An annual time series of weekly size-resolved aerosol properties in the megacity of Metro Manila, Philippines.

Authors:  Connor Stahl; Melliza Templonuevo Cruz; Paola Angela Bañaga; Grace Betito; Rachel A Braun; Mojtaba Azadi Aghdam; Maria Obiminda Cambaliza; Genevieve Rose Lorenzo; Alexander B MacDonald; Preciosa Corazon Pabroa; John Robin Yee; James Bernard Simpas; Armin Sorooshian
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 6.444

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.