Literature DB >> 17160393

Individual and work related risk factors for neck pain among office workers: a cross sectional study.

B Cagnie1, L Danneels, D Van Tiggelen, V De Loose, D Cambier.   

Abstract

Work related neck disorders are common problems in office workers, especially among those who are intensive computer users. It is generally agreed that the etiology of work related neck disorders is multidimensional which is associated with, and influenced by, a complex array of individual, physical and psychosocial factors. The aim of the current study was to estimate the one-year prevalence of neck pain among office workers and to determine which physical, psychological and individual factors are associated with these prevalences. Five hundred and twelve office workers were studied. Information was collected by an online questionnaire. Self-reported neck pain during the preceding 12 months was regarded as a dependent variable, whereas different individual, work-related physical and psychosocial factors were studied as independent variables. The 12 month prevalences of neck pain in office workers was 45.5%. Multivariate analysis revealed that women had an almost two-fold risk compared with men (OR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.22-3.13). The odds ratio for age indicates that persons older than 30 years have 2.61 times more chance of having neck pain than younger individuals (OR = 2.61, 95% CI 1.32-3.47). Being physically active decreases the likelihood of having neck pain (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.14-2.99). Significant associations were found between neck pain and often holding the neck in a forward bent posture for a prolonged time (OR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.20-3.38), often sitting for a prolonged time (OR = 2.06, 95% CI 1.17-3.62) and often making the same movements per minute (OR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.02-2.60). Mental tiredness at the end of the workday (OR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.29-3.26) and shortage of personnel (OR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.06-2.76) are significantly associated with neck pain. The results of this study indicate that physical and psychosocial work factors, as well as individual variables, are associated with the frequency of neck pain. These association patterns suggest also opportunities for intervention strategies in order to stimulate an ergonomic work place setting and increase a positive psychosocial work environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17160393      PMCID: PMC2213555          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0269-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  30 in total

1.  Longitudinal study on work related and individual risk factors affecting radiating neck pain.

Authors:  E Viikari-Juntura; R Martikainen; R Luukkonen; P Mutanen; E P Takala; H Riihimäki
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Dutch Musculoskeletal Questionnaire: description and basic qualities.

Authors:  V H Hildebrandt; P M Bongers; F J van Dijk; H C Kemper; J Dul
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2001-10-10       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  A field comparison of neck and shoulder postures in symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers.

Authors:  Grace P Y Szeto; Leon Straker; Sally Raine
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  A comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers performing monotonous keyboard work--2: neck and shoulder kinematics.

Authors:  Grace P Y Szeto; Leon M Straker; Peter B O'Sullivan
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2005-07-05

5.  A comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers performing monotonous keyboard work--1: neck and shoulder muscle recruitment patterns.

Authors:  Grace P Y Szeto; Leon M Straker; Peter B O'Sullivan
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2005-07-05

6.  Risk factors for neck pain: a longitudinal study in the general population.

Authors:  P R Croft; M Lewis; A C Papageorgiou; E Thomas; M I Jayson; G J Macfarlane; A J Silman
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  A prospective study of computer users: II. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders.

Authors:  Michele Marcus; Fredric Gerr; Carolyn Monteilh; Daniel J Ortiz; Eileen Gentry; Susan Cohen; Alicia Edwards; Cindy Ensor; David Kleinbaum
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  Are neck flexion, neck rotation, and sitting at work risk factors for neck pain? Results of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  G A Ariëns; P M Bongers; M Douwes; M C Miedema; W E Hoogendoorn; G van der Wal; L M Bouter; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 9.  The nature of work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Peter W Buckle; J Jason Devereux
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.661

10.  The prevalence of neck pain: a population-based study from northern Sweden.

Authors:  Michel Guez; Christer Hildingsson; Marie Nilsson; Göran Toolanen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2002-08
View more
  58 in total

1.  A literature review of neck pain associated with computer use: public health implications.

Authors:  Bart N Green
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2008-08

2.  Association between objectively measured sitting time and neck-shoulder pain among blue-collar workers.

Authors:  David M Hallman; Nidhi Gupta; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  The effect of walking while typing on neck/shoulder patterns.

Authors:  Larissa M Fedorowich; Kim Emery; Julie N Côté
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Workstyle and Musculoskeletal Discomfort (MSD): Exploring the Influence of Work Culture in Malaysia.

Authors:  Ismail Maakip; Tessa Keegel; Jodi Oakman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-12

5.  Group-based exercise at workplace: short-term effects of neck and shoulder resistance training in video display unit workers with work-related chronic neck pain-a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Giuseppa M Caputo; Mauro Di Bari; José Naranjo Orellana
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 6.  The Relationship Between Forward Head Posture and Neck Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nesreen Fawzy Mahmoud; Karima A Hassan; Salwa F Abdelmajeed; Ibraheem M Moustafa; Anabela G Silva
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

7.  Comparison of the effectiveness of resistance training in women with chronic computer-related neck pain: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Xiao Li; Caina Lin; Cuicui Liu; Songjian Ke; Qing Wan; Haijie Luo; Zhuxi Huang; Wenjun Xin; Chao Ma; Shaoling Wu
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Inter-individual variation in vertebral kinematics affects predictions of neck musculoskeletal models.

Authors:  Derek D Nevins; Liying Zheng; Anita N Vasavada
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Task-specific frequencies of neck motion measured in healthy young adults over a five-day period.

Authors:  Daniel G Cobian; Andrew C Sterling; Paul A Anderson; Bryan C Heiderscheit
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Individual, physical and psychological risk factors for neck pain in Australian office workers: a 1-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Julia M Hush; Zoe Michaleff; Christopher G Maher; Kathryn Refshauge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.