Literature DB >> 17160250

[Evaluation of tests performed to confirm the position of the Veress needle for creation of pneumoperitoneum in selected patients: a prospective clinical trial].

Otávio Cansanção de Azevedo1, João Luiz Moreira Coutinho Azevedo, Albino Augusto Sorbello, Gustavo Peixoto Soares Miguel, Jorge Luis Wilson Junior, Antônio Cláudio de Godoy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate tests performed to confirm the position of the Veress needle inserted into the left hypochondrium for creation of pneumoperitonium.
METHODS: One hundred patients were submitted to laparoscopic procedure with left hypochondrium puncturing. Needle positioning tests were evaluated. The aspiration test was considered positive when organic material was aspirated; the injection test was considered positive when no increased resistance to liquid injection was observed; the recovery test was considered positive when the liquid injected was not recovered; the saline drop test was considered positive when drops of saline in the syringe disappeared quickly; the initial intraperitoneal pressure test was considered positive when pressure levels were 8 pounds mmHg. A positive aspiration test indicated iatrogenic injury, whereas a positive result in any of the other tests indicated that the tip of the needle was correctly positioned in the peritoneal cavity. Sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the tests were calculated by correlating results considered true positives (a), false positives (b), false negatives (c) and true negatives (d), according to the formulas: SE = [a/(a + c)] x 100; SP = [d/(b + d)] x 100; PPV = [a/(a + b)] x 100; NPV = [d(c + d)] x 100.
RESULTS: With regard to the aspiration test, SE and PPV were not applicable, SP was 100% and NPV was 100%. With regard to the injection test, SE was 0%, SP was 100%, PPV was inexistent and NPV was 90%. Both recovery and saline drop tests yielded the following results: SE was 50%, SP was 100%, PPV was 100% and NPV was 94.7%. The initial intraperitoneal pressure test yielded the following results: SE, SP, PPV and NPV were 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: When inserting the Veress needle into the left hypochondrium, a negative aspiration test guarantees the absence of iatrogenic injury; the injection test is not reliable to determine incorrect needle positioning, but it accurately detects correct needle positioning; recovery and saline drop tests are not reliable to determine correct needle positioning, but they accurately detect incorrect needle positioning; the initial intraperitoneal pressure test is reliable to determine both correct and incorrect needle positioning, and proved to be the most reliable of the tests analyzed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17160250     DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502006000600006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cir Bras        ISSN: 0102-8650            Impact factor:   1.388


  7 in total

1.  Laparoscopic entry: the modified alwis method and more.

Authors:  Thomas T Vellinga; Sarath De Alwis; Yoko Suzuki; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of Veress needle entry versus direct trocar entry in gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Greg J Marchand; Ahmed Masoud; Alexa King; Giovanna Brazil; Hollie Ulibarri; Julia Parise; Amanda Arroyo; Catherine Coriell; Sydnee Goetz; Carmen Moir; Ashley Christensen; Tia Alexander; Malini Govindan
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 3.  Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramifications.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Trocar Injuries in Laparoscopy: Techniques, Tools, and Means for Prevention. A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Bram Cornette; Frederik Berrevoet
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Creation of pneumoperitoneum: noninvasive monitoring of clinical effects of elevated intraperitoneal pressure for the insertion of the first trocar.

Authors:  Octávio Henrique Mendes Hypólito; João Luiz Moreira Coutinho Azevedo; Fabiana Mara Scarpelli de Lima Alvarenga Caldeira; Otávio Cansanção de Azevedo; Susana Abe Miyahira; Gustavo Peixoto Soares Miguel; Otávio Monteiro Becker; Afonso Cesar Cabral Guedes Machado; Gilberto Pinheiro Nunes Filho; Glícia Cansanção Azevedo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of two entry methods for laparoscopic port entry: technical point of view.

Authors:  Adriana Toro; Maurizio Mannino; Giovanni Cappello; Andrea Di Stefano; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2012-06-13

7.  Comparison of two methods of laparoscopic trocar insertion (Hasson and Visiport) in terms of speed and complication in urologic surgery.

Authors:  Mehrdad Mohammadi; Behnam Shakiba; Matin Shirani
Journal:  Biomedicine (Taipei)       Date:  2018-11-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.