Literature DB >> 17159694

Musculoskeletal manifestations of physical abuse after intimate partner violence.

Mohit Bhandari1, Sonia Dosanjh, Paul Tornetta, David Matthews.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Domestic violence is the most common cause of nonfatal injury to women in the United States, with an estimated cost of $50 billion annually. Little is known about the spectrum of musculoskeletal injuries in victims of domestic violence. We examined the characteristics of abused women, the prevalence of musculoskeletal injuries, and the variables associated with increasing frequency of physical violence against women.
METHODS: We identified all female survivors of intimate partner violence who were referred to the Minnesota Domestic Abuse Program from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2003. Characteristics of each woman's background, abuse history, and injuries were obtained by a trained program therapist in an in-depth, 2-hour intake interview. Specific data forms were completed for each interview. Five forms of experienced abuse were explored (physical, emotional, psychological, sexual, and financial). Injuries were subcategorized as (1) head and neck, (2) musculoskeletal, (3) chest, (4) abdomen, and (5) skin (integumentary system). We conducted regression analyses to determine factors associated with the frequency of physical abuse.
RESULTS: Of 270 potentially eligible women, 263 (97%) with complete records were included. Women were commonly Caucasian (62%) in their third decade of life with one or more children (87%). A history of abuse was recalled by over half of the women (54%). The most prevalent forms of abuse were emotional (84%), psychological (68%), physical (43%), sexual (41%), and financial (38%). Child protective services were concomitantly involved in half of the women living in abusive relationships. Among those women who reported physical abuse, 36% sought medical attention. We identified 144 injuries in 218 physically abused women. Head and neck injuries were the most prevalent after intimate partner violence (40%). Musculoskeletal injuries were the second most common manifestation of intimate partner violence (28%). The spectrum of injuries included sprains (n = 21 injuries), fracture/dislocations (n = 17 injuries), and foot injuries (n = 2 injuries). Our analysis identified seven variables associated with increasing physical abuse frequency. These included (1) younger age (p = 0.04); (2) shorter length of relationship (p = 0.049); (3) emotional abuse (p = 0.02); (4) psychological abuse (p = 0.003); (5) sexual abuse (p = 0.004); (6) drug dependency (p = 0.05); and (7) alcohol dependency (p = 0.045).
CONCLUSIONS: Among women presenting to a domestic violence therapy program seeking counseling, head and neck and musculoskeletal injuries were most common. Frequency of physical abuse was most likely to be associated with younger women who are in short-term relationships, have chemical and alcohol dependency, and concomitant emotional, psychological, and sexual abuse. Recognizing musculoskeletal injuries in women as a potential result of intimate partner violence is warranted. Identifying children exposed to abusive situations may further alert treating surgeons to the potential for intimate partner violence in the mother.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17159694     DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196419.36019.5a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  33 in total

1.  Intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Andrew A House
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Emotional intimate partner violence experienced by men in same-sex relationships.

Authors:  Cory R Woodyatt; Rob Stephenson
Journal:  Cult Health Sex       Date:  2016-04-25

3.  "I've never asked one question." Understanding the barriers among orthopedic surgery residents to screening female patients for intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Lesley Gotlib Conn; Aynsely Young; Ori D Rotstein; Emil Schemitsch
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  Cochrane in CORR (®): Screening Women for Intimate Partner Violence in Healthcare Settings (Review).

Authors:  Kim Madden; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Editorial: orthopaedics, advocacy, action.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Editorial: Protecting Patients from Intimate-partner Violence-What the Orthopaedic Surgeon Can Do.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Imaging patterns of lower extremity injuries in victims of intimate partner violence (IPV).

Authors:  Babina Gosangi; Jordan Lebovic; Hyesun Park; Richard Thomas; Rahul Gujrathi; Mitchel Harris; Paul Tornetta; Bharti Khurana
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2021-02-24

8.  Orthopaedic Trainees Retain Knowledge After a Partner Abuse Course: An Education Study.

Authors:  Kim Madden; Sheila Sprague; Brad A Petrisor; Forough Farrokhyar; Michelle A Ghert; Marium Kirmani; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Maxillofacial injuries associated with intimate partner violence in women.

Authors:  Norkhafizah Saddki; Adlin A Suhaimi; Razak Daud
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  PRevalence of Abuse and Intimate Partner Violence Surgical Evaluation (P.R.A.I.S.E.): rationale and design of a multi-center cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; Sheila Sprague; Sonia Dosanjh; Victor Wu; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.