BACKGROUND: Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) is defined as low-level HBV DNA without hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Prevalence estimates vary widely. We determined the prevalence of occult HBV at the University of Cincinnati Infectious Diseases Center (IDC). METHODS: Patients in the IDC HIV database (n = 3867) were randomly selected using a 25% sampling fraction. Samples were pooled for HBV nucleic acid extraction. Pools were tested for HBV DNA by a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay to co-amplify core/surface protein regions. The PCR assay was run on all individual samples from each DNA pool. DNA samples were tested for HBV serologic markers. RESULTS: A total of 909 patients without known HBV were selected. The mean CD4 count was 384 cells/mm. Forty-three patients were HBV DNA. Twelve of 43 were DNA/HBsAg (95% confidence interval for database: 0.58% to 1.90%). Five of 12 were negative for all serologic markers. Alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and HBV DNA titers were elevated in HBsAg patients versus occult patients and versus HIV-monoinfected patients. No other significant differences were detected. No occult HBV patient was on treatment with anti-HBV activity. CONCLUSIONS: Forty-three percent of those with HBV were not previously identified as HBV, indicating the need for ongoing screening in high-risk populations. Occult HBV may occur in persons with all negative serologic markers, representing a challenge for identification.
BACKGROUND: Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) is defined as low-level HBV DNA without hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Prevalence estimates vary widely. We determined the prevalence of occult HBV at the University of Cincinnati Infectious Diseases Center (IDC). METHODS:Patients in the IDC HIV database (n = 3867) were randomly selected using a 25% sampling fraction. Samples were pooled for HBV nucleic acid extraction. Pools were tested for HBV DNA by a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay to co-amplify core/surface protein regions. The PCR assay was run on all individual samples from each DNA pool. DNA samples were tested for HBV serologic markers. RESULTS: A total of 909 patients without known HBV were selected. The mean CD4 count was 384 cells/mm. Forty-three patients were HBV DNA. Twelve of 43 were DNA/HBsAg (95% confidence interval for database: 0.58% to 1.90%). Five of 12 were negative for all serologic markers. Alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and HBV DNA titers were elevated in HBsAg patients versus occult patients and versus HIV-monoinfected patients. No other significant differences were detected. No occult HBVpatient was on treatment with anti-HBV activity. CONCLUSIONS: Forty-three percent of those with HBV were not previously identified as HBV, indicating the need for ongoing screening in high-risk populations. Occult HBV may occur in persons with all negative serologic markers, representing a challenge for identification.
Authors: T R Dinesha; J Boobalan; S Sivamalar; D Subashini; S S Solomon; K G Murugavel; P Balakrishnan; D M Smith; S Saravanan Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 3.728
Authors: Matthew C Foy; Chloe L Thio; Hyon S Hwang; Melissa Saulynas; James P Hamilton; Derek M Fine; Mohamed G Atta Journal: Clin Vaccine Immunol Date: 2012-03-21
Authors: C M Martin; J A Welge; N J Shire; S D Rouster; M T Shata; K E Sherman; J T Blackard Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2009-11-02 Impact factor: 3.728
Authors: Christina M Martin; Jeffrey A Welge; Norah J Shire; Mohamed T Shata; Kenneth E Sherman; Jason T Blackard Journal: Cytokine Date: 2009-07-21 Impact factor: 3.861