Rosemary Dray-Spira1, Bruno Spire, Isabelle Heard, France Lert. 1. INSERM, U687, Saint-Maurice, and Université Paris XI, IFR69, Villejuif, and Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Service d'immunologie clinique, Paris, France. rosemary.dray-spira@st-maurice.inserm.fr
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Benefits from HAART may be heterogeneous across people living with HIV. We measured the differences in the rate of HAART failure across the various subgroups represented at the level of a country. DESIGN: We used data from a national representative sample of people living with HIV and followed at hospital in France (ANRS-EN12-VESPA Study). METHODS: Analyses were restricted to 896 participants on HAART for 6 months or more, who were antiretroviral naive at HAART initiation. Different indicators of treatment failure were defined: immunological failure (absence of an increase of 100 CD4 cells/microl or more); immunovirological failure (CD4 cell count of 200 cells/microl or less and detectable HIV-RNA); clinical failure (occurrence of an AIDS-defining illness more than 3 months after HAART initiation). Differences in the frequency of treatment failure were measured using logistic regression models adjusted for major established determinants of response to HAART. RESULTS: Overall, 19.6% of the study participants experienced immunological failure, 3.4% immunovirological failure, and 3.0% clinical failure, with substantial variations across the various subgroups. Compared with homo/bisexual men, migrants had higher rates of immunological failure (adjusted odds ratio 2.27, 95% confidence interval 1.14-4.56 for migrant men and 2.19, 1.17-4.08 for migrant women), immunovirological failure (8.23, 1.77-38.33 and 6.91, 1.03-46.32), and clinical failure (4.60, 1.01-20.86 and 4.22, 0.84-21.17). CONCLUSION: In France, migrants consistently appear to be at increased risk of treatment failure compared with other people with HIV. Understanding the reasons underlying such heterogeneity in terms of living conditions and educational/cultural background will be important.
OBJECTIVES: Benefits from HAART may be heterogeneous across people living with HIV. We measured the differences in the rate of HAART failure across the various subgroups represented at the level of a country. DESIGN: We used data from a national representative sample of people living with HIV and followed at hospital in France (ANRS-EN12-VESPA Study). METHODS: Analyses were restricted to 896 participants on HAART for 6 months or more, who were antiretroviral naive at HAART initiation. Different indicators of treatment failure were defined: immunological failure (absence of an increase of 100 CD4 cells/microl or more); immunovirological failure (CD4 cell count of 200 cells/microl or less and detectable HIV-RNA); clinical failure (occurrence of an AIDS-defining illness more than 3 months after HAART initiation). Differences in the frequency of treatment failure were measured using logistic regression models adjusted for major established determinants of response to HAART. RESULTS: Overall, 19.6% of the study participants experienced immunological failure, 3.4% immunovirological failure, and 3.0% clinical failure, with substantial variations across the various subgroups. Compared with homo/bisexual men, migrants had higher rates of immunological failure (adjusted odds ratio 2.27, 95% confidence interval 1.14-4.56 for migrant men and 2.19, 1.17-4.08 for migrant women), immunovirological failure (8.23, 1.77-38.33 and 6.91, 1.03-46.32), and clinical failure (4.60, 1.01-20.86 and 4.22, 0.84-21.17). CONCLUSION: In France, migrants consistently appear to be at increased risk of treatment failure compared with other people with HIV. Understanding the reasons underlying such heterogeneity in terms of living conditions and educational/cultural background will be important.
Authors: Bani Tamraz; Yong Huang; Audrey L French; Seble Kassaye; Kathryn Anastos; Marek J Nowicki; Stephen Gange; Deborah R Gustafson; Peter Bacchetti; Ruth M Greenblatt; Pirro G Hysi; Bradley E Aouizerat Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 6.903
Authors: Anne Gosselin; Eva Lelièvre; Andrainolo Ravalihasy; Nathalie Lydié; France Lert; Annabel Desgrées du Loû Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marie Ballif; Bruno Ledergerber; Manuel Battegay; Matthias Cavassini; Enos Bernasconi; Patrick Schmid; Bernard Hirschel; Hansjakob Furrer; Martin Rickenbach; Milos Opravil; Rainer Weber Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 3.240