Literature DB >> 17159121

Exploring disability rating scale responsiveness II: do more response options help?

S J Cano1, R J O'Connor, A J Thompson, J C Hobart.   

Abstract

The Barthel Index (BI) may underestimate disability change because its items have few response options. We examined whether a similar scale with more response options (Functional Independence Measure, FIM) was more responsive (n = 1,396). The FIM had greater potential for responsiveness and identified more people who changed. However, its actual responsiveness, measured by effect sizes, equaled that of the BI. This counterintuitive finding suggests that effect sizes may be limited indicators of responsiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17159121     DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000247664.97643.e8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  9 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  T Lam; V K Noonan; J J Eng
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Psychometric comparisons of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale.

Authors:  Keh-Chung Lin; Tiffany Fu; Ching-Yi Wu; Yu-Wei Hsieh; Chia-Ling Chen; Pei-Chin Lee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the FACE-Q Scales for Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Stefan J Cano; Charles A East; Stephen B Baker; Lydia Badia; Jonathan A Schwitzer; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.611

4.  The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) in clinical trials: cross-cultural validation in venous thromboembolism patients.

Authors:  Stefan J Cano; Donna L Lamping; Luke Bamber; Sarah Smith
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Assessing measurement invariance of familism and parental respect across race/ethnicity in adolescents.

Authors:  Jeremy N V Miles; Regina A Shih; Joan S Tucker; Annie Zhou; Elizabeth J D'Amico
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Comparison of Rehabilitation Outcomes for Long Term Neurological Conditions: A Cohort Analysis of the Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Dataset for Adults of Working Age.

Authors:  Lynne Turner-Stokes; Roxana Vanderstay; Tara Stevermuer; Frances Simmonds; Fary Khan; Kathy Eagar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Comparing the functional independence measure and the interRAI/MDS for use in the functional assessment of older adults: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Christine Glenny; Paul Stolee
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2009-11-29       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Severity score system for progressive myelopathy: development and validation of a new clinical scale.

Authors:  R M Castilhos; D Blank; C B O Netto; C F M Souza; L N T Fernandes; I V D Schwartz; R Giugliani; L B Jardim
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.590

9.  The Canadian survey of health, lifestyle and ageing with multiple sclerosis: methodology and initial results.

Authors:  Michelle Ploughman; Serge Beaulieu; Chelsea Harris; Stephen Hogan; Olivia J Manning; Penelope W Alderdice; John D Fisk; A Dessa Sadovnick; Paul O'Connor; Sarah A Morrow; Luanne M Metz; Penelope Smyth; Nancy Mayo; Ruth Ann Marrie; Katherine B Knox; Mark Stefanelli; Marshall Godwin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.