Literature DB >> 17159062

Increasing use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation arrest: survival implications of guideline changes.

Thomas D Rea1, Michael Helbock, Stephen Perry, Michele Garcia, Don Cloyd, Linda Becker, Mickey Eisenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The most recent resuscitation guidelines have sought to improve the interface between defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation; the survival impact of these changes is unknown, however. A year before issuance of the most recent guidelines, we implemented protocol changes that provided a single shock without rhythm reanalysis, stacked shocks, or postdefibrillation pulse check, and extended the period of cardiopulmonary resuscitation from 1 to 2 minutes. We hypothesized that survival would be better with the new protocol. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The present study took place in a community with a 2-tiered emergency medical services response and an established system of cardiac arrest surveillance, training, and review. The investigation was a cohort study of persons who had bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation arrest because of heart disease, comparing a prospectively defined intervention group (January 1, 2005, to January 31, 2006) with a historical control group that was treated according to previous guidelines of rhythm reanalysis, stacked shocks, and postdefibrillation pulse checks (January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2004). The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. The proportion of treated arrests that met inclusion criteria was similar for intervention and control periods (15.4% [134/869] versus 16.6% [374/2255]). Survival to hospital discharge was significantly greater during the intervention period compared with the control period (46% [61/134] versus 33% [122/374], P=0.008) and corresponded to a decrease in the interval from shock to start of chest compressions (28 versus 7 seconds). Adjustment for covariates did not alter the survival association.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the new resuscitation guidelines will alter the interface between defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation and in turn may improve outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17159062     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.654715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  43 in total

1.  [Improved survival by guideline compliant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: analysis of primary survival rates in the Hamburg emergency medical service].

Authors:  S Maisch; A Krüger; S Oppermann; A E Goetz; P Friederich
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Cardiac arrest survival did not increase in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium after implementation of the 2005 AHA CPR and ECC guidelines.

Authors:  Blair L Bigham; Kent Koprowicz; Tom Rea; Paul Dorian; Tom P Aufderheide; Daniel P Davis; Judy Powell; Laurie J Morrison
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  New strategies for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Jonas A Cooper; Joshua M Cooper
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-02

6.  Association between survival and early versus later rhythm analysis in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: do agency-level factors influence outcomes?

Authors:  Thomas Rea; David Prince; Laurie Morrison; Clifton Callaway; Tom Aufderheide; Mohamed Daya; Ian Stiell; Jim Christenson; Judy Powell; Craig Warden; Lois van Ottingham; Peter Kudenchuk; Myron Weisfeldt
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  New Developments in Cardiac Arrest Management.

Authors:  Matthias L Riess
Journal:  Adv Anesth       Date:  2016

Review 8.  Sudden Cardiac Death in the Young.

Authors:  Michael Ackerman; Dianne L Atkins; John K Triedman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Survival increases with CPR by Emergency Medical Services before defibrillation of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia: observations from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium.

Authors:  Steven M Bradley; Erin E Gabriel; Tom P Aufderheide; Roxy Barnes; Jim Christenson; Daniel P Davis; Ian G Stiell; Graham Nichol
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Effect of timing and duration of a single chest compression pause on short-term survival following prolonged ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Gregory P Walcott; Sharon B Melnick; Robert G Walker; Isabelle Banville; Fred W Chapman; Cheryl R Killingsworth; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 5.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.