BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic role of N-terminal pro-B-natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) serum level compared with C-reactive protein (CRP) level and creatinine clearance (CrCl) for the subsequent risk of cardiovascular events in a large cohort of patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Serum concentrations of NT-proBNP and CRP and CrCl were measured at baseline in a cohort of 1051 patients aged 30 to 70 years with CHD. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the prognostic value of NT-proBNP, CRP, and CrCl on a combined cardiovascular disease (CVD) end point (fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke). RESULTS: During follow-up (mean of 48.7 months), 95 patients (9.0%) experienced a secondary CVD event. Patients in the top quartile of the NT-proBNP distribution at baseline had a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.34 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.74-6.45) for subsequent secondary CVD events compared with those in the bottom quartile (P for trend <.001) after controlling for age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes mellitus, initial management of CHD, rehabilitation clinic, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and treatment with lipid-lowering drugs. For CRP, the corresponding HR was 1.76 (95% CI, 0.96-3.24) (P value for trend, .06). Patients with CrCl levels lower than 60 mL/min had an HR of 2.39 (95% CI, 1.06-5.40) compared with patients with a CrCl of 90 mL/min or higher (P for trend, .002). If all 3 markers were included simultaneously in 1 model, NT-proBNP still showed predictive ability for recurrent CVD events. CONCLUSION: N-terminal proBNP may be a clinically useful marker weeks after an acute coronary event and may provide complementary prognostic information to established risk determinants.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic role of N-terminal pro-B-natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) serum level compared with C-reactive protein (CRP) level and creatinine clearance (CrCl) for the subsequent risk of cardiovascular events in a large cohort of patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Serum concentrations of NT-proBNP and CRP and CrCl were measured at baseline in a cohort of 1051 patients aged 30 to 70 years with CHD. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the prognostic value of NT-proBNP, CRP, and CrCl on a combined cardiovascular disease (CVD) end point (fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke). RESULTS: During follow-up (mean of 48.7 months), 95 patients (9.0%) experienced a secondary CVD event. Patients in the top quartile of the NT-proBNP distribution at baseline had a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.34 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.74-6.45) for subsequent secondary CVD events compared with those in the bottom quartile (P for trend <.001) after controlling for age, sex, smoking status, history of diabetes mellitus, initial management of CHD, rehabilitation clinic, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and treatment with lipid-lowering drugs. For CRP, the corresponding HR was 1.76 (95% CI, 0.96-3.24) (P value for trend, .06). Patients with CrCl levels lower than 60 mL/min had an HR of 2.39 (95% CI, 1.06-5.40) compared with patients with a CrCl of 90 mL/min or higher (P for trend, .002). If all 3 markers were included simultaneously in 1 model, NT-proBNP still showed predictive ability for recurrent CVD events. CONCLUSION: N-terminal proBNP may be a clinically useful marker weeks after an acute coronary event and may provide complementary prognostic information to established risk determinants.
Authors: Bob Siegerink; Renke Maas; Carla Y Vossen; Edzard Schwedhelm; Wolfgang Koenig; Rainer Böger; Dietrich Rothenbacher; Hermann Brenner; Lutz P Breitling Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Adriano Caixeta; Gregg W Stone; Roxana Mehran; Edwin A Lee; Brent T McLaurin; David A Cox; Michel E Bertrand; A Michael Lincoff; Jeffrey W Moses; Harvey D White; E Magnus Ohman; Tullio Palmerini; George Syros; Christos Kittas; Martin Fahy; W Craig Hooper; Alexandra J Lansky; George D Dangas Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Carol L Clark; Thomas A Gibson; Robert E Weiss; Annick N Yagapen; Susan E Malveau; David H Adler; Aveh Bastani; Christopher W Baugh; Jeffrey M Caterino; Deborah B Diercks; Judd E Hollander; Bret A Nicks; Daniel K Nishijima; Manish N Shah; Kirk A Stiffler; Alan B Storrow; Scott T Wilber; Benjamin C Sun Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Nisha Bansal; Ronit Katz; Lorien Dalrymple; Ian de Boer; Christopher DeFilippi; Bryan Kestenbaum; Meyeon Park; Mark Sarnak; Stephen Seliger; Michael Shlipak Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Lutz P Breitling; Wolfgang Koenig; Marcus Fischer; Ziad Mallat; Christian Hengstenberg; Dietrich Rothenbacher; Hermann Brenner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-07-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ricardo León de la Fuente; Patrycja A Naesgaard; Stein Tore Nilsen; Leik Woie; Torbjoern Aarsland; Patricio Gallo; Heidi Grundt; Harry Staines; Dennis W T Nilsen Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Trygve Brügger-Andersen; Volker Pönitz; Harry Staines; David Pritchard; Heidi Grundt; Dennis W T Nilsen Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2008-11-25 Impact factor: 2.298