BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown an inverse gradient in socioeconomic status for disability after stroke. However, no distinction has been made between the period in the stroke rehabilitation unit (SRU) and the period after discharge. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of education and equivalent income on motor and functional recovery for both periods. METHODS: 419 consecutive patients were recruited from six SRUs across Europe. The Barthel Index (BI) and Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) were measured on admission, at discharge and 6 months after stroke. Ordinal logistic regression models were used, adjusting for case mix. Cumulative odds ratios (OR) were calculated to measure differences in recovery between educational levels and income groups with adjustments for case mix. RESULTS: Patients with a low educational level were less likely to improve on the BI (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.87) and the RMA arm during inpatient stay (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.94). For this period, no differences in recovery were found between income groups. After discharge, patients with a low equivalent income were less likely to improve on all three sections of the RMA: gross function (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.66), leg and trunk (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.55) and arm (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.87). No differences were found for education. CONCLUSIONS: During inpatient rehabilitation, educational level was a determinant of recovery, while after discharge, equivalent income played an important role. This study suggests that it is important to develop a better understanding of how socioeconomic factors affect the recovery of stroke patients.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown an inverse gradient in socioeconomic status for disability after stroke. However, no distinction has been made between the period in the stroke rehabilitation unit (SRU) and the period after discharge. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of education and equivalent income on motor and functional recovery for both periods. METHODS: 419 consecutive patients were recruited from six SRUs across Europe. The Barthel Index (BI) and Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA) were measured on admission, at discharge and 6 months after stroke. Ordinal logistic regression models were used, adjusting for case mix. Cumulative odds ratios (OR) were calculated to measure differences in recovery between educational levels and income groups with adjustments for case mix. RESULTS:Patients with a low educational level were less likely to improve on the BI (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.87) and the RMA arm during inpatient stay (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.94). For this period, no differences in recovery were found between income groups. After discharge, patients with a low equivalent income were less likely to improve on all three sections of the RMA: gross function (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.66), leg and trunk (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.55) and arm (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.87). No differences were found for education. CONCLUSIONS: During inpatient rehabilitation, educational level was a determinant of recovery, while after discharge, equivalent income played an important role. This study suggests that it is important to develop a better understanding of how socioeconomic factors affect the recovery of strokepatients.
Authors: D Jakovljević; C Sarti; J Sivenius; J Torppa; M Mähönen; P Immonen-Räihä; E Kaarsalo; K Alhainen; K Kuulasmaa; J Tuomilehto; P Puska; V Salomaa Journal: Stroke Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Amanda G Thrift; Helen M Dewey; Jonathan W Sturm; Seana L Paul; Amanda K Gilligan; Velandai K Srikanth; Richard A L Macdonell; John J McNeil; Malcolm R Macleod; Geoffrey A Donnan Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-01-19 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Martijn Huisman; Anton E Kunst; Matthias Bopp; Jens-Kristian Borgan; Carme Borrell; Giuseppe Costa; Patrick Deboosere; Sylvie Gadeyne; Myer Glickman; Chiara Marinacci; Christoph Minder; Enrique Regidor; Tapani Valkonen; Johan P Mackenbach Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Feb 5-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Mandip S Dhamoon; Yeseon Park Moon; Myunghee C Paik; Ralph L Sacco; Mitchell S V Elkind Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Parker Magin; Anousha Victoire; Xi May Zhen; John Furler; Marie Pirotta; Daniel S Lasserson; Christopher Levi; Amanda Tapley; Mieke van Driel Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Mandip S Dhamoon; Yeseon Park Moon; Myunghee C Paik; Bernadette Boden-Albala; Tatjana Rundek; Ralph L Sacco; Mitchell S V Elkind Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-06-25 Impact factor: 7.914