Literature DB >> 17158236

Minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukemia (FAB AML-M0) is associated with an adverse outcome in children: a report from the Children's Oncology Group, studies CCG-2891 and CCG-2961.

Draga Barbaric1, Todd A Alonzo, Robert B Gerbing, Soheil Meshinchi, Nyla A Heerema, Dorothy R Barnard, Beverly J Lange, William G Woods, Robert J Arceci, Franklin O Smith.   

Abstract

To assess the impact of minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukemia (AML-M0) morphology in children, we analyzed 2 sequential Children's Cancer Group AML clinical trials. We compared presenting characteristics and outcomes of 82 CCG-2891 and CCG-2961 patients with de novo, non-Down syndrome (DS) AML-M0 with those of 1620 patients with non-M0 AML, and of 10 CCG-2891 patients with DS-associated AML-M0 with those of 179 with DS-associated non-M0 AML. Morphology and cytogenetics were centrally reviewed. The non-DS AML-M0 children had a lower white blood cell (WBC) count (P = .001) than their non-M0 counterparts and a higher incidence of chromosome 5 deletions (P = .002), nonconstitutional trisomy 21 (P = .027), and hypodiploidy (P = .002). Outcome analyses considering all children with non-DS AML demonstrated no significant differences between M0 and non-M0 patients. Analyses restricted to intensive-timing CCG-2891 and CCG-2961 demonstrated comparable complete response (CR) rates (79% and 78%) between non-DS M0 and non-M0 patients. Overall survival (OS) from diagnosis (38% +/- 14% versus 51% +/- 3%; P = .160) was not significantly different between the 2 groups. OS from end of induction (45% +/- 17% versus 63% +/- 3%; P = .038), event-free survival (EFS; 23% +/- 11% versus 41% +/- 3%; P = .018), and disease-free survival (DFS; 31% +/- 14% versus 52% +/- 3%; P = .009) were inferior in the M0 group. There was no significant outcome difference between DS-associated AML-M0 and non-M0 children. This study suggests that intensively treated non-DS-associated AML-M0 children have an inferior outcome compared with children with non-M0 AML.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17158236      PMCID: PMC1852193          DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-11-025536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  31 in total

1.  Analysis of FLT3-activating mutations in 979 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia: association with FAB subtypes and identification of subgroups with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Christian Thiede; Christine Steudel; Brigitte Mohr; Markus Schaich; Ulrike Schäkel; Uwe Platzbecker; Martin Wermke; Martin Bornhäuser; Markus Ritter; Andreas Neubauer; Gerhard Ehninger; Thomas Illmer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Molecular cytogenetic analysis of 10;11 rearrangements in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  H Van Limbergen; B Poppe; A Janssens; R De Bock; A De Paepe; L Noens; F Speleman
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  Acute myeloblastic leukemia with minimal myeloid differentiation (FAB AML-M0): a study of eleven cases.

Authors:  A Sempere; I Jarque; M Guinot; J Palau; R García; G F Sanz; F Gomis; M L Pérez-Sirvent; L Senent; M A Sanz
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  1993-12

4.  Proposal for the recognition of minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML-MO)

Authors:  J M Bennett; D Catovsky; M T Daniel; G Flandrin; D A Galton; H R Gralnick; C Sultan
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 6.998

5.  Increased age at diagnosis has a significantly negative effect on outcome in children with Down syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children's Cancer Group Study 2891.

Authors:  Alan S Gamis; William G Woods; Todd A Alonzo; Allen Buxton; Beverly Lange; Dorothy R Barnard; Stuart Gold; Franklin O Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-07-28       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Analysis of treatment failure in patients with minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukemia (AML-M0).

Authors:  R Stasi; G Del Poeta; A Venditti; M Masi; E Stipa; T Dentamaro; C Cox; B Dallapiccola; G Papa
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Minimally differentiated acute nonlymphocytic leukemia: a distinct entity.

Authors:  E J Lee; A Pollak; R D Leavitt; J R Testa; C A Schiffer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Cytogenetics in acute leukemia.

Authors:  Krzysztof Mrózek; Nyla A Heerema; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 8.250

9.  FLT3 internal tandem duplication in 234 children with acute myeloid leukemia: prognostic significance and relation to cellular drug resistance.

Authors:  Christian M Zwaan; Soheil Meshinchi; Jerald P Radich; Anjo J P Veerman; Dieuwke R Huismans; Leonhard Munske; Martina Podleschny; Karel Hählen; Rob Pieters; Martin Zimmermann; Dirk Reinhardt; Jochen Harbott; Ursula Creutzig; Gertjan J L Kaspers; Frank Griesinger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Extramedullary leukemia in children with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.

Authors:  Kathryn E Dusenbery; William B Howells; Diane C Arthur; Todd Alonzo; Jae Won Lee; Nathan Kobrinsky; Dorothy R Barnard; Robert J Wells; Jonathan D Buckley; Beverly J Lange; William G Woods
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.289

View more
  5 in total

1.  UNC2025, a MERTK Small-Molecule Inhibitor, Is Therapeutically Effective Alone and in Combination with Methotrexate in Leukemia Models.

Authors:  Deborah DeRyckere; Alisa B Lee-Sherick; Madeline G Huey; Amanda A Hill; Jeffrey W Tyner; Kristen M Jacobsen; Lauren S Page; Gregory G Kirkpatrick; Fatma Eryildiz; Stephanie A Montgomery; Weihe Zhang; Xiaodong Wang; Stephen V Frye; H Shelton Earp; Douglas K Graham
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Adult acute erythroleukemia: an analysis of 91 patients treated at a single institution.

Authors:  F P S Santos; S Faderl; G Garcia-Manero; C Koller; M Beran; S O'Brien; S Pierce; E J Freireich; X Huang; G Borthakur; C Bueso-Ramos; M de Lima; M Keating; J Cortes; H Kantarjian; F Ravandi
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  DNA methylation epitypes highlight underlying developmental and disease pathways in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Brian Giacopelli; Min Wang; Ada Cleary; Yue-Zhong Wu; Anna Reister Schultz; Maximilian Schmutz; James S Blachly; Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld; Bethany Mundy-Bosse; Sebastian Vosberg; Philipp A Greif; Rainer Claus; Lars Bullinger; Ramiro Garzon; Kevin R Coombes; Clara D Bloomfield; Brian J Druker; Jeffrey W Tyner; John C Byrd; Christopher C Oakes
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Leukemia Mediated Endothelial Cell Activation Modulates Leukemia Cell Susceptibility to Chemotherapy through a Positive Feedback Loop Mechanism.

Authors:  Bahareh Pezeshkian; Christopher Donnelly; Kelley Tamburo; Timothy Geddes; Gerard J Madlambayan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A transcriptomic continuum of differentiation arrest identifies myeloid interface acute leukemias with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Jonathan Bond; Aleksandra Krzywon; Ludovic Lhermitte; Christophe Roumier; Anne Roggy; Mohamed Belhocine; Alexander Abdulkader Kheirallah; Patrick Villarese; Guillaume Hypolite; Francine Garnache-Ottou; Sylvie Castaigne; Nicolas Boissel; Vahid Asnafi; Claude Preudhomme; Hervé Dombret; Elisa Laurenti; Elizabeth Macintyre
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 11.528

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.