OBJECTIVE: Public opinion and professional organisations dominate the euthanasia debate, and there is a need to understand the opinions of people confronted with euthanasia. The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients and their GPs talk about euthanasia, and if so, how they communicate about this. METHODS: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were held with 20 GPs and 30 of their patients in primary care in the Netherlands, where euthanasia is legalised. The patients had a life expectancy of less than 6 months, and cancer, heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as underlying disease. RESULTS: Many patients did not communicate about euthanasia with their GP. Neither the patient nor the GP were clear in formulating their expectations concerning future decision making. CONCLUSION: The initial patient-GP communication consisted of an exchange of opinions about situations in which euthanasia would be desirable. GPs had different opinions about who should initiate communication, and found it difficult to judge the right moment to talk. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: It is essential to pay attention to education in communication about dying and euthanasia and to train the GPs to gain insight in the patient's end-of-life preferences, and to direct care at the best possible quality of life.
OBJECTIVE: Public opinion and professional organisations dominate the euthanasia debate, and there is a need to understand the opinions of people confronted with euthanasia. The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients and their GPs talk about euthanasia, and if so, how they communicate about this. METHODS: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were held with 20 GPs and 30 of their patients in primary care in the Netherlands, where euthanasia is legalised. The patients had a life expectancy of less than 6 months, and cancer, heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as underlying disease. RESULTS: Many patients did not communicate about euthanasia with their GP. Neither the patient nor the GP were clear in formulating their expectations concerning future decision making. CONCLUSION: The initial patient-GP communication consisted of an exchange of opinions about situations in which euthanasia would be desirable. GPs had different opinions about who should initiate communication, and found it difficult to judge the right moment to talk. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: It is essential to pay attention to education in communication about dying and euthanasia and to train the GPs to gain insight in the patient's end-of-life preferences, and to direct care at the best possible quality of life.
Authors: Susanne J J Claessen; Michael A Echteld; Anneke L Francke; Lieve Van den Block; Gé A Donker; Luc Deliens Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Willemjan Slort; Annette H Blankenstein; Bernardina S Wanrooij; Henriëtte E van der Horst; Luc Deliens Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Aline De Vleminck; Dirk Houttekier; Koen Pardon; Reginald Deschepper; Chantal Van Audenhove; Robert Vander Stichele; Luc Deliens Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.581