Alan C Moss1, Eva Morris, Jan Leyden, Padraic MacMathuna. 1. Gastrointestinal Unit, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 1, Ireland. amoss@bidmc.harvard.edu <amoss@bidmc.harvard.edu>
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical bypass and endoscopic stents are available for palliative bypass of malignant distal biliary obstruction. AIM: Comparison of reported outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which included surgery, endoscopic plastic stents or endoscopic metal stents in palliative relief of malignant distal biliary obstruction. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature and conference proceedings review to June 2006. RESULTS: We found 24 studies, containing 2436 patients, which met our inclusion criteria. Endoscopic stenting with plastic stents (three studies) is associated with a lower risk of complications (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.81), but a higher risk of recurrent biliary obstruction (RR 18.59, 95% CI 5.33 -64.86) than traditional surgical bypass. Self-expanding metal stents (seven studies) are associated with a significantly reduced risk of recurrent biliary obstruction at 4 months (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.3, 0.63), or prior to death or end of study (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.39-0.69), but are not superior to plastic stents in terms of technical success, therapeutic success, mortality or complications. Cost-effectiveness outcomes were not suitable for meta-analysis. No other plastic stent designs have been demonstrated to be superior to polyethylene stents (12 studies). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic metal stents are the intervention of choice in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction, producing similar outcomes to plastic stents, but with improved patency rates.
BACKGROUND: Surgical bypass and endoscopic stents are available for palliative bypass of malignant distal biliary obstruction. AIM: Comparison of reported outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which included surgery, endoscopic plastic stents or endoscopic metal stents in palliative relief of malignant distal biliary obstruction. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature and conference proceedings review to June 2006. RESULTS: We found 24 studies, containing 2436 patients, which met our inclusion criteria. Endoscopic stenting with plastic stents (three studies) is associated with a lower risk of complications (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.81), but a higher risk of recurrent biliary obstruction (RR 18.59, 95% CI 5.33 -64.86) than traditional surgical bypass. Self-expanding metal stents (seven studies) are associated with a significantly reduced risk of recurrent biliary obstruction at 4 months (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.3, 0.63), or prior to death or end of study (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.39-0.69), but are not superior to plastic stents in terms of technical success, therapeutic success, mortality or complications. Cost-effectiveness outcomes were not suitable for meta-analysis. No other plastic stent designs have been demonstrated to be superior to polyethylene stents (12 studies). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic metal stents are the intervention of choice in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction, producing similar outcomes to plastic stents, but with improved patency rates.
Authors: Rodrigo Castaño; Tercio L Lopes; Oscar Alvarez; Victor Calvo; Leticia P Luz; Everson L A Artifon Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-02-21 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: B Laquente; A Calsina-Berna; A Carmona-Bayonas; P Jiménez-Fonseca; I Peiró; A Carrato Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: C P Neal; S C Thomasset; D Bools; C D Sutton; G Garcea; C D Mann; Y Rees; C Newland; R J Robinson; A R Dennison; D P Berry Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Tobin J Strom; Jason B Klapman; Gregory M Springett; Kenneth L Meredith; Sarah E Hoffe; Junsung Choi; Pamela Hodul; Mokenge P Malafa; Ravi Shridhar Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 4.584