Literature DB >> 17157463

Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses.

Jeanne Guiraud1, Stéphane Gallego, Laure Arnold, Patrick Boyle, Eric Truy, Lionel Collet.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to distinguish the effects of different parameters on latencies of wave IIIe, wave Ve, and interpeak interval IIIe-Ve of electrical auditory brainstem responses (EABRs). EABRs were recorded from all the intra-cochlear electrodes in eight adult HiRes90K((R)) cochlear implant users. The relationship between latencies and stimulation sites in the cochlea was characterized to assess activity along the auditory pathway. Audiograms before implantation, psychophysics at first fitting and duration of deafness were used to describe the influence of deafness on latencies. A decreasing baso-apical latency gradient was found for waves IIIe and Ve, while the interpeak interval IIIe-Ve remained the same along the electrode array. Electrical stimulation enabling to stimulate various parts of the cochlea at the same time, this could indicate an anatomical way of compensating for the delay the acoustic wave takes to reach the cochlea apex in a non-implanted ear. However, psychophysical levels were also found to increase at the cochlear base showing that the latency gradient could result from an increasing gradient of neural degeneration toward the base. Correlations of EABR latencies with psychophysics, audiometric data and duration of deafness show that factors linked to deafness have indeed an influence on EABR latencies. The possible explanations for the latency shift observed, whether they are anatomical and/or pathological, are exposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17157463     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  3 in total

1.  Examination and Comparison of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials and Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Results of Children with Cochlear Implantation without Inner Ear Anomaly.

Authors:  Seda Bayrak; Başak Mutlu; Günay Kırkım; Bülent Şerbetçioğlu
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-27

2.  Peak I of the human auditory brainstem response results from the somatic regions of type I spiral ganglion cells: evidence from computer modeling.

Authors:  Frank Rattay; Simon M Danner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses).

Authors:  Nicolas Guevara; Michel Hoen; Eric Truy; Stéphane Gallego
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.