Literature DB >> 17157117

Clinical assessment of pain, tolerability, and preference of an autoinjection pen versus a prefilled syringe for patient self-administration of the fully human, monoclonal antibody adalimumab: the TOUCH trial.

Alan Kivitz1, Steven Cohen, James Edward Dowd, William Edwards, Suman Thakker, Frank R Wellborne, Cheryl L Renz, Oscar G Segurado.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adalimumab is a therapeutic monoclonal antibody for SC administration by 2 single-use injection devices providing bioequivalent amounts of adalimumab: a ready-to-use, prefilled syringe and an integrated, disposable delivery system, the autoinjection Pen. Although pens have been shown to be preferred over syringes by patients requiring long-term SC administration of medications, there are no data on preference and pain in the use of biologics in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess injection-site pain, tolerability, and patient preference of 2 delivery systems of adalimumab.
METHODS: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis were enrolled in a Phase II, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, sequential trial. Patients self-administered a standard dose of adalimumab 40 mg SC every other week at each of 3 monitored clinical visits: visit 1 (syringe), visits 2 and 3 (Pen). At each visit, patients rated their pain on an 11-point scale (0 = none to 10 = pain as bad as it could be) immediately after injection and 15-30 minutes after injection and provided their impressions of and preferences for each delivery system. Safety events were recorded throughout the study and 70 days after final study dose.
RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled in the trial and completed all 3 visits (32 women, 20 men; mean [SD] age, 53.8 [12.1] years). Forty (76.9%) patients reported that the Pen was less painful than the syringe, 4 (7.7%) patients found the syringe to be less painful, and 8 (15.4%) patients had no preference. Patients had statistically significant reductions in injection-pain scores from visit 1 to visit 2 and from visit 1 to visit 3. No new safety signals or apparent differences regarding tolerability between the syringe and Pen were observed. In addition, 46 (88.5%) patients preferred the Pen, 3 (5.8%) preferred the syringe, and 3 (5.8%) had no preference. Overall, patients evaluated the Pen as easier to use (94.2%), more convenient (92.3%), requiring less time to inject (82.7%), and safer (88.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients experienced less pain self-administering adalimumab via the Pen and preferred it versus the syringe. Further, patients perceived the Pen to be easier to use and more convenient. Both delivery systems were generally well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17157117     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  40 in total

1.  Usability and Patient Preference Phase 3 Study of the Sarilumab Pen in Patients with Active Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Alan Kivitz; Lydie Baret-Cormel; Hubert van Hoogstraten; Sheldon Wang; Janie Parrino; Christine Xu; Marina Stanislav
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2017-12-05

2.  Perceptions and Preferences of Two Etanercept Autoinjectors for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A New European Union-Approved Etanercept Biosimilar (Benepali®) Versus Etanercept (Enbrel®) - Findings from a Nurse Survey in Europe.

Authors:  Kunal Thakur; Anna Biberger; Alexandra Handrich; Mourad Farouk Rezk
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2016-05-23

3.  Lubiprostone vs Senna in postoperative orthopedic surgery patients with opioid-induced constipation: a double-blind, active-comparator trial.

Authors:  Christina M Marciniak; Santiago Toledo; Jungwha Lee; Michael Jesselson; Jillian Bateman; Benjamin Grover; Joy Tierny
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Comparison of patient satisfaction with two different etanercept delivery systems. A randomised controlled study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  U Müller-Ladner; R M Flipo; P Vincendon; Y Brault; D Kielar
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  Cost effectiveness of moderate to severe psoriasis therapy with etanercept and ustekinumab in the United States.

Authors:  Reginald Villacorta; Joel W Hay; Andrew Messali
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Evaluation of the Octreotide Acetate Pen Injector and its Instructions for Use in a Formative Human Factors Study.

Authors:  Anthony Andre; Nicholas Squittieri; Satyashodhan B Patil
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Assessment of self-injection experience in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: psychometric validation of the Self-Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ).

Authors:  Dorothy Keininger; Geoffroy Coteur
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Assessing patients' satisfaction with anti-TNFα treatment in Crohn's disease: qualitative steps of the development of a new questionnaire.

Authors:  Claire Marant; Benoit Arnould; Alexia Marrel; Céderic Spizak; Jean-Frédéric Colombel; Patrick Faure; Hervé Hagege; Marc Lemann; Stéphane Nahon; Gilbert Tucat; Luc Vandromme; Emmanuel Thibout; Gérard Goldfarb
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-27

9.  Drug focus: adalimumab in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis.

Authors:  Gino A Vena; Nicoletta Cassano
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2007-06

Review 10.  A Systematic Review of Patients' Perspectives on the Subcutaneous Route of Medication Administration.

Authors:  Colin H Ridyard; Dalia M M Dawoud; Lorna V Tuersley; Dyfrig A Hughes
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.