Literature DB >> 17156270

Variable selection for logistic regression using a prediction-focused information criterion.

Gerda Claeskens1, Christophe Croux, Johan Van Kerckhoven.   

Abstract

In biostatistical practice, it is common to use information criteria as a guide for model selection. We propose new versions of the focused information criterion (FIC) for variable selection in logistic regression. The FIC gives, depending on the quantity to be estimated, possibly different sets of selected variables. The standard version of the FIC measures the mean squared error of the estimator of the quantity of interest in the selected model. In this article, we propose more general versions of the FIC, allowing other risk measures such as the one based on L(p) error. When prediction of an event is important, as is often the case in medical applications, we construct an FIC using the error rate as a natural risk measure. The advantages of using an information criterion which depends on both the quantity of interest and the selected risk measure are illustrated by means of a simulation study and application to a study on diabetic retinopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17156270     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00567.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  6 in total

1.  Variable selection strategies in survival models with multiple imputations.

Authors:  Filia Vonta; Alex Karagrigoriou
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  MODEL AVERAGING BASED ON KULLBACK-LEIBLER DISTANCE.

Authors:  Xinyu Zhang; Guohua Zou; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.261

3.  An improved model averaging scheme for logistic regression.

Authors:  D Ghosh; Z Yuan
Journal:  J Multivar Anal       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.473

4.  Selecting SNPs to identify ancestry.

Authors:  Joshua N Sampson; Kenneth K Kidd; Judith R Kidd; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.670

5.  A synthetic estimator for the efficacy of clinical trials with all-or-nothing compliance.

Authors:  Joseph Antonelli; Bing Han; Matthew Cefalu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Imbalanced Seismic Event Discrimination Using Supervised Machine Learning.

Authors:  Hyeongki Ahn; Sangkyeum Kim; Kyunghyun Lee; Ahyeong Choi; Kwanho You
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.