Literature DB >> 17156269

Generalized additive modeling with implicit variable selection by likelihood-based boosting.

Gerhard Tutz1, Harald Binder.   

Abstract

The use of generalized additive models in statistical data analysis suffers from the restriction to few explanatory variables and the problems of selection of smoothing parameters. Generalized additive model boosting circumvents these problems by means of stagewise fitting of weak learners. A fitting procedure is derived which works for all simple exponential family distributions, including binomial, Poisson, and normal response variables. The procedure combines the selection of variables and the determination of the appropriate amount of smoothing. Penalized regression splines and the newly introduced penalized stumps are considered as weak learners. Estimates of standard deviations and stopping criteria, which are notorious problems in iterative procedures, are based on an approximate hat matrix. The method is shown to be a strong competitor to common procedures for the fitting of generalized additive models. In particular, in high-dimensional settings with many nuisance predictor variables it performs very well.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17156269     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00578.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  29 in total

1.  A penalty approach to differential item functioning in Rasch models.

Authors:  Gerhard Tutz; Gunther Schauberger
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Regularization for generalized additive mixed models by likelihood-based boosting.

Authors:  A Groll; G Tutz
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Relaxation-induced anxiety: Effects of peak and trajectories of change on treatment outcome for generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Michelle G Newman; Lucas S Lafreniere; Nicholas C Jacobson
Journal:  Psychother Res       Date:  2016-11-18

4.  Semiparametric regression during 2003-2007.

Authors:  David Ruppert; M P Wand; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 1.125

5.  Integrating Coronary Plaque Information from CCTA by ML Predicts MACE in Patients with Suspected CAD.

Authors:  Guanhua Dou; Dongkai Shan; Kai Wang; Xi Wang; Zinuan Liu; Wei Zhang; Dandan Li; Bai He; Jing Jing; Sicong Wang; Yundai Chen; Junjie Yang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-07

6.  A boosting method for maximizing the partial area under the ROC curve.

Authors:  Osamu Komori; Shinto Eguchi
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Urinary Exosomal MicroRNAs as Potential Non-invasive Biomarkers in Breast Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Marc Hirschfeld; Gerta Rücker; Daniela Weiß; Kai Berner; Andrea Ritter; Markus Jäger; Thalia Erbes
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.074

8.  Boosted Multivariate Trees for Longitudinal Data.

Authors:  Amol Pande; Liang Li; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; John Ehrlinger; Udaya B Kogalur; Eugene H Blackstone; Hemant Ishwaran
Journal:  Mach Learn       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.940

9.  Graph based fusion of miRNA and mRNA expression data improves clinical outcome prediction in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephan Gade; Christine Porzelius; Maria Fälth; Jan C Brase; Daniela Wuttig; Ruprecht Kuner; Harald Binder; Holger Sültmann; Tim Beissbarth
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Incorporating pathway information into boosting estimation of high-dimensional risk prediction models.

Authors:  Harald Binder; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.