Literature DB >> 17155779

Noseleaf furrows in a horseshoe bat act as resonance cavities shaping the biosonar beam.

Qiao Zhuang1, Rolf Müller.   

Abstract

Horseshoe bats emit their ultrasonic biosonar pulses through nostrils surrounded by intricately shaped protuberances (noseleaves). While these noseleaves have been hypothesized to affect the sonar beam, their physical function has never been analyzed. Using numerical methods, we show that conspicuous furrows in the noseleaf act as resonance cavities shaping the sonar beam. This demonstrates that (a) animals can use resonances in external, half-open cavities to direct sound emissions, (b) structural detail in the faces of bats can have acoustic effects even if it is not adjacent to the emission sites, and (c) specializations in the biosonar system of horseshoe bats allow for differential processing of subbands of the pulse in the acoustic domain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17155779     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.218701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev Lett        ISSN: 0031-9007            Impact factor:   9.161


  11 in total

1.  The furrows of Rhinolophidae revisited.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Reijniers Jonas; Peremans Herbert
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  What noseleaves do for FM bats depends on their degree of sensorial specialization.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Fons De Mey; Herbert Peremans; Inga Geipel; Elisabeth Kalko; Uwe Firzlaff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Information generated by the moving pinnae of Rhinolophus rouxi: tuning of the morphology at different harmonics.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Jonas Reijniers; Jan Steckel; Herbert Peremans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Dominant glint based prey localization in horseshoe bats: a possible strategy for noise rejection.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Jonas Reijniers; Uwe Firzlaff; Herbert Peremans
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Lancet dynamics in greater horseshoe bats, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum.

Authors:  Weikai He; Scott C Pedersen; Anupam K Gupta; James A Simmons; Rolf Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The noseleaf of Rhinolophus formosae focuses the Frequency Modulated (FM) component of the calls.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Ya-Fu Lee; Inga Geipel; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Yen-Min Kuo; Herbert Peremans
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  The aerodynamic cost of head morphology in bats: maybe not as bad as it seems.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Herbert Peremans; Norizham Abdul Razak; Edouard Verstraelen; Grigorios Dimitriadis; Greg Dimitriadis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Intensity and directionality of bat echolocation signals.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Signe Brinkløv; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Noseleaf dynamics during pulse emission in horseshoe bats.

Authors:  Lin Feng; Li Gao; Hongwang Lu; Rolf Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Species-specific control of acoustic gaze by echolocating bats, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon and Pipistrellus abramus, during flight.

Authors:  Yasufumi Yamada; Shizuko Hiryu; Yoshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.