Literature DB >> 17155509

Statistically enhanced self-attraction of random patterns.

D B Lukatsky1, K B Zeldovich, E I Shakhnovich.   

Abstract

In this work we develop a theory of interaction of randomly patterned surfaces as a generic prototype model of protein-protein interactions. The theory predicts that pairs of randomly superimposed identical (homodimeric) random patterns have always twice as large magnitude of the energy fluctuations with respect to their mutual orientation, as compared with pairs of different (heterodimeric) random patterns. The amplitude of the energy fluctuations is proportional to the square of the average pattern density, to the square of the amplitude of the potential and its characteristic length, and scales linearly with the area of surfaces. The greater dispersion of interaction energies in the ensemble of homodimers implies that strongly attractive complexes of random surfaces are much more likely to be homodimers, rather than heterodimers. Our findings suggest a plausible physical reason for the anomalously high fraction of homodimers observed in real protein interaction networks.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17155509     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.178101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev Lett        ISSN: 0031-9007            Impact factor:   9.161


  18 in total

1.  Sample-to-sample torque fluctuations in a system of coaxial randomly charged surfaces.

Authors:  Ali Naji; Jalal Sarabadani; David S Dean; Rudolf Podgornik
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 1.890

2.  Structural similarity enhances interaction propensity of proteins.

Authors:  D B Lukatsky; B E Shakhnovich; J Mintseris; E I Shakhnovich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  The ruggedness of protein-protein energy landscape and the cutoff for 1/r(n) potentials.

Authors:  Anatoly M Ruvinsky; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Emergence of symmetry in homooligomeric biological assemblies.

Authors:  Ingemar André; Charlie E M Strauss; David B Kaplan; Philip Bradley; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Improvisation in evolution of genes and genomes: whose structure is it anyway?

Authors:  Boris E Shakhnovich; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Evolution of protein binding modes in homooligomers.

Authors:  Judith E Dayhoff; Benjamin A Shoemaker; Stephen H Bryant; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Robust protein protein interactions in crowded cellular environments.

Authors:  Eric J Deeds; Orr Ashenberg; Jaline Gerardin; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Proteins evolve on the edge of supramolecular self-assembly.

Authors:  Hector Garcia-Seisdedos; Charly Empereur-Mot; Nadav Elad; Emmanuel D Levy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The role of structural pleiotropy and regulatory evolution in the retention of heteromers of paralogs.

Authors:  Axelle Marchant; Angel F Cisneros; Alexandre K Dubé; Isabelle Gagnon-Arsenault; Diana Ascencio; Honey Jain; Simon Aubé; Chris Eberlein; Daniel Evans-Yamamoto; Nozomu Yachie; Christian R Landry
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Intrinsic disorder in protein interactions: insights from a comprehensive structural analysis.

Authors:  Jessica H Fong; Benjamin A Shoemaker; Sergiy O Garbuzynskiy; Michail Y Lobanov; Oxana V Galzitskaya; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.