Literature DB >> 17154756

On the likelihood ratio test in structural equation modeling when parameters are subject to boundary constraints.

Reinoud D Stoel1, Francisca Galindo Garre, Conor Dolan, Godfried van den Wittenboer.   

Abstract

The authors show how the use of inequality constraints on parameters in structural equation models may affect the distribution of the likelihood ratio test. Inequality constraints are implicitly used in the testing of commonly applied structural equation models, such as the common factor model, the autoregressive model, and the latent growth curve model, although this is not commonly acknowledged. Such constraints are the result of the null hypothesis in which the parameter value or values are placed on the boundary of the parameter space. For instance, this occurs in testing whether the variance of a growth parameter is significantly different from 0. It is shown that in these cases, the asymptotic distribution of the chi-square difference cannot be treated as that of a central chi-square-distributed random variable with degrees of freedom equal to the number of constraints. The correct distribution for testing 1 or a few parameters at a time is inferred for the 3 structural equation models mentioned above. Subsequently, the authors describe and illustrate the steps that one should take to obtain this distribution. An important message is that using the correct distribution may lead to appreciably greater statistical power. Copyright 2006 APA.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17154756     DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.4.439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  23 in total

1.  Correction for Item Response Theory Latent Trait Measurement Error in Linear Mixed Effects Models.

Authors:  Chun Wang; Gongjun Xu; Xue Zhang
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Hierarchical diagnostic classification models: a family of models for estimating and testing attribute hierarchies.

Authors:  Jonathan Templin; Laine Bradshaw
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Piecewise latent growth models: beyond modeling linear-linear processes.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Harring; Marian M Strazzeri; Shelley A Blozis
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04

4.  Testing Variance Components in Linear Mixed Modeling Using Permutation.

Authors:  Han Du; Lijuan Wang
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Bayesian Evaluation of inequality-constrained Hypotheses in SEM Models using Mplus.

Authors:  Rens van de Schoot; Herbert Hoijtink; Michael N Hallquist; Paul A Boelen
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 6.125

6.  Pathways of Internalizing and Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms Across Childhood and Adolescence.

Authors:  Laura Miller-Graff; Susan Yoon; Julia L Paulson; Kathryn Maguire-Jack
Journal:  Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol       Date:  2020-09-26

7.  A generalized Defries-Fulker regression framework for the analysis of twin data.

Authors:  Laura C Lazzeroni; Amrita Ray
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Modeling Cyclical Patterns in Daily College Drinking Data with Many Zeroes.

Authors:  David Huh; Debra L Kaysen; David C Atkins
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Factor structure of intelligence and divergent thinking subtests: A registered report.

Authors:  Russell T Warne; Sam Golightly; Makai Black
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Modeling individual differences in the timing of change onset and offset.

Authors:  Daniel McNeish; Daniel J Bauer; Denis Dumas; Douglas H Clements; Jessica R Cohen; Weili Lin; Julie Sarama; Margaret A Sheridan
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2021-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.