Literature DB >> 17154400

MELD-XI: a rational approach to "sickest first" liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients requiring anticoagulant therapy.

Douglas M Heuman1, Anastasios A Mihas, Adil Habib, Hochong S Gilles, R Todd Stravitz, Arun J Sanyal, Robert A Fisher.   

Abstract

Priority for "sickest first" liver transplantation (LT) in the United States is determined by the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). MELD is a good predictor of short-term mortality in cirrhosis, but it can overestimate risk when international normalized ratio (INR) is artificially elevated by anticoagulation. An alternate prognostic index omitting INR is needed in this situation. We retrospectively analyzed survival data for 554 cirrhotic veterans referred for consideration of LT prior to December 1, 2003 (training group). Using logistic regression we derived a predictive formula for 90-day pretransplant mortality incorporating bilirubin and creatinine but omitting INR. We normalized this formula to the same scale as MELD using linear regression. This yielded MELD-XI (for MELD excluding INR) = 5.11 Ln(bilirubin) + 11.76 Ln(creatinine) + 9.44. Accuracy of MELD-XI was validated in a holdout group of 278 cirrhotic veterans referred after December 1, 2003, and in an independent validation dataset of 7,203 cirrhotic adults listed for LT in the United States between May 1, 2001, and October 31, 2001. MELD-XI and MELD correlated well in training, holdout, and independent validation cohorts (r = 0.930, 0.954, and 0.902, respectively). In the holdout cohort, c-statistics of MELD vs. MELD-XI for mortality were, respectively, 0.939 vs. 0.906 at 30 days;0.860 vs. 0.841 at 60 days; 0.842 vs. 0.829 at 90 days; and 0.795 vs. 0.797 at 180 days. In the independent validation dataset, c-statistics for MELD vs. MELD-XI as predictors of 90-day survival were, respectively, 0.857 vs. 0.843 in noncholestatic liver diseases and 0.905 vs. 0.894 in cholestatic liver diseases. Comparable MELD and MELD-XI scores were associated with comparable prognosis. In conclusion, MELD-XI, despite omission of INR, is nearly as accurate as MELD in predicting short-term survival in cirrhosis. In patients treated with oral anticoagulants, substitution of MELD-XI for MELD may permit more accurate assessment of risk and more rational assignment of "sickest first" priority for LT. (c) 2006 AASLD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17154400     DOI: 10.1002/lt.20906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  48 in total

1.  An Emphasis on Screening to Detect Liver Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Having Undergone the Fontan Procedure in Early Childhood.

Authors:  Samragnyi Madala; Kira MacDougall; Abhishek Polavarapu; Dinesh Gurala; Vivek Gumaste; Gerard Morvillo
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11-23

Review 2.  Prioritization for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Evangelos Cholongitas; Giacomo Germani; Andrew K Burroughs
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Superior Mesenteric Arterial Flow Pattern is Associated with Major Adverse Events in Adults with Fontan Circulation.

Authors:  Makoto Mori; Kayoko Shioda; Robert W Elder; Maria A Pernetz; Fred H Rodriguez; Alicia Rangosch; Brian E Kogon; Wendy M Book
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 4.  Model for End-stage Liver Disease.

Authors:  Ashwani K Singal; Patrick S Kamath
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2012-12-01

5.  Combination of liver biopsy with MELD-XI scores for post-transplant outcome prediction in patients with advanced heart failure and suspected liver dysfunction.

Authors:  Maryjane Farr; James Mitchell; Matthew Lippel; Tomoko S Kato; Zhezhen Jin; Paul Ippolito; Lorna Dove; Ulrich P Jorde; Hiroo Takayama; Jean Emond; Yoshifumi Naka; Donna Mancini; Jay H Lefkowitch; P Christian Schulze
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 6.  Model for end-stage liver disease: end of the first decade.

Authors:  Sumeet K Asrani; W Ray Kim
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 6.126

7.  Risk prediction in infective endocarditis by modified MELD-XI score.

Authors:  Peng-Cheng He; Xue-Biao Wei; Si-Ni Luo; Xiao-Lan Chen; Zu-Hui Ke; Dan-Qing Yu; Ji-Yan Chen; Yuan-Hui Liu; Ning Tan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  A Propensity-matched Survival Analysis: Do Simultaneous Liver-lung Transplant Recipients Need a Liver?

Authors:  Kyle Freischlag; Brian Ezekian; Paul M Schroder; Michael S Mulvihill; Morgan L Cox; Matthew G Hartwig; Stuart Knechtle
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Implications of Alternative Hepatorenal Prognostic Scoring Systems in Acute Heart Failure (from DOSE-AHF and ROSE-AHF).

Authors:  Justin L Grodin; Dianne Gallup; Kevin J Anstrom; G Michael Felker; Horng H Chen; W H Wilson Tang
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Value of MELD and MELD-based indices in surgical risk evaluation of cirrhotic patients: retrospective analysis of 190 cases.

Authors:  Beatriz P Costa; F Castro Sousa; Marco Serôdio; César Carvalho
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.