PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effect of behavioral modeling and social factors promoting stair use. DESIGN: Alternating baseline and intervention phase experimental design. SETTING: San Diego International Airport, San Diego, California. SUBJECTS: Stair use was coded for 15,574 filmed participants. INTERVENTION: This study compared the effects of three types of behavioral modeling: natural models (i.e., passersby), single experimental model (i.e., confederate), and confederate model pairs providing verbal prompts. MEASURES: Variables were coded based on systematic observation of videotapes, including demographics, day and time, and the following indicators of physical and social reinforcement contingencies: dress, luggage, children, social group, and speed. Reliability ranged from .64 to .88. ANALYSIS: Bivariate and logistic regression models stratified by gender. RESULTS: Stair use increased over baseline by 102.6% with no model present and by 61.8% in the presence of natural models for men and women (p < .001). Controlling for multiple covariates, the odds ratios for stair use ranged from 1.76 to 2.93 for men and from 1.82 to 2.54 for women across the levels with natural and confederate models present (all p < .001). CONCLUSION: Modeling can prompt stair use, and findings for social and environmental reinforcement contingencies support the Behavioral Ecological Model. Modeling may explain partial maintenance of stair use in public areas after removal of prompts (e.g., signs, banners). Results inform interventions for increasing physical activity as part of daily routines.
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effect of behavioral modeling and social factors promoting stair use. DESIGN: Alternating baseline and intervention phase experimental design. SETTING:San Diego International Airport, San Diego, California. SUBJECTS: Stair use was coded for 15,574 filmed participants. INTERVENTION: This study compared the effects of three types of behavioral modeling: natural models (i.e., passersby), single experimental model (i.e., confederate), and confederate model pairs providing verbal prompts. MEASURES: Variables were coded based on systematic observation of videotapes, including demographics, day and time, and the following indicators of physical and social reinforcement contingencies: dress, luggage, children, social group, and speed. Reliability ranged from .64 to .88. ANALYSIS: Bivariate and logistic regression models stratified by gender. RESULTS: Stair use increased over baseline by 102.6% with no model present and by 61.8% in the presence of natural models for men and women (p < .001). Controlling for multiple covariates, the odds ratios for stair use ranged from 1.76 to 2.93 for men and from 1.82 to 2.54 for women across the levels with natural and confederate models present (all p < .001). CONCLUSION: Modeling can prompt stair use, and findings for social and environmental reinforcement contingencies support the Behavioral Ecological Model. Modeling may explain partial maintenance of stair use in public areas after removal of prompts (e.g., signs, banners). Results inform interventions for increasing physical activity as part of daily routines.
Authors: Melbourne F Hovell; Marc A Adams; C Richard Hofstetter; Ana P Martínez-Donate; Guillermo J González-Pérez; Liza S Rovniak; Marie C Boman-Davis Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-09-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jeanne M McCaffery; Carol E Franz; Kristen Jacobson; Tricia M Leahey; Hong Xian; Rena R Wing; Michael J Lyons; William S Kremen Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: John Bellettiere; Ben Nguyen; Sandy Liles; Vincent Berardi; Marc A Adams; Paddy Dempsey; Yael Benporat; Jacqueline Kerr; Andrea Z LaCroix; Melbourne Hovell Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Nancy T Artinian; Gerald F Fletcher; Dariush Mozaffarian; Penny Kris-Etherton; Linda Van Horn; Alice H Lichtenstein; Shiriki Kumanyika; William E Kraus; Jerome L Fleg; Nancy S Redeker; Janet C Meininger; Joanne Banks; Eileen M Stuart-Shor; Barbara J Fletcher; Todd D Miller; Suzanne Hughes; Lynne T Braun; Laurie A Kopin; Kathy Berra; Laura L Hayman; Linda J Ewing; Philip A Ades; J Larry Durstine; Nancy Houston-Miller; Lora E Burke Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-07-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Claudia M Carrizosa; Elaine J Blumberg; Melbourne F Hovell; Ana P Martinez-Donate; Gregorio Garcia-Gonzalez; Remedios Lozada; Norma J Kelley; C Richard Hofstetter; Carol L Sipan Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Jacob Szeszulski; Sonia Vega-López; Michael Todd; Frank Ray; Alma Behar; Maria Campbell; Adrian Chavez; Ryan Eckert; Anabell Lorenzo-Quintero; Leopoldo Hartmann Manrique; Noe C Crespo Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Sandy Liles; Melbourne F Hovell; Georg E Matt; Joy M Zakarian; Jennifer A Jones Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Ding Ding; Melbourne F Hovell; Ming Ji; C Richard Hofstetter; Pinpin Zheng; Hua Fu; Suzanne C Hughes Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-05-06 Impact factor: 4.244