Literature DB >> 17152030

Impact of postdischarge surveillance on the rate of surgical site infection after orthopedic surgery.

Kaisa Huotari1, Outi Lyytikäinen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of postdischarge surveillance on surgical site infection (SSI) rates after orthopedic surgery.
SETTING: Nine hospitals participating in the Finnish Hospital Infection Program. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent hip or knee arthroplasty or open reduction of a femur fracture during 1999-2002.
RESULTS: The date of discharge was available for 11,812 procedures (90%). The median length of hospital stay was 8 days (range per hospital, 6-9 days). The overall SSI rate was 3.3% (range, 0.8%-6.4%). Of 384 SSIs detected, 216 (56%; range, 28%-90%) were detected after discharge: 93 (43%) were detected on readmission to the hospital, 73 (34%) at completion of a postdischarge questionnaire, and 23 (11%) at a follow-up visit. For 27 postdischarge SSIs (13%), the location of detection was unknown. Altogether, 32 (86%) of 37 of organ/space SSIs, 57 (80%) of 71 deep incisional SSIs, and 127 (46%) of 276 superficial incisional SSIs were detected after discharge. Most SSIs (70%) detected on readmission were severe (organ/space or deep incisional), whereas most SSIs (86%) detected at follow-up visits or at completion of a postdischarge questionnaire were superficial. Of all SSIs, 78% (range, 48%-100%) were microbiologically confirmed. Microbiologic confirmation was less common after discharge than during postoperative hospital stay (66% vs 93%; P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Postdischarge surveillance had a large impact on the rate of SSI detected after orthopedic surgery. However, postdischarge surveillance conducted by means of a questionnaire detected only a minority of deep incisional and organ/space SSIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17152030     DOI: 10.1086/509840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  19 in total

1.  High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSE.

Authors:  Joachim Singer; Andreas Merz; Lars Frommelt; Bernd Fink
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Logistic requirements and biopsy of periprosthetic infections: what should be taken into consideration?].

Authors:  B Fink; P Schäfer; L Frommelt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Assessing the gold standard: a review of 253 two-stage revisions for infected TKA.

Authors:  Tahir Mahmud; Matthew C Lyons; Douglas D Naudie; Steven J Macdonald; Richard W McCalden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  When do readmissions for infection occur after spine and total joint procedures?

Authors:  Elliot Nacke; Nikko Ramos; Spencer Stein; Lorraine Hutzler; Joseph A Bosco
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Periprosthetic joint infections at a teaching hospital in 1990-2007.

Authors:  Alexandre Renaud; Martin Lavigne; Pascal-André Vendittoli
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Articulating spacers used in two-stage revision of infected hip and knee prostheses abrade with time.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Annett Rechtenbach; Hubert Büchner; Sebastian Vogt; Michael Hahn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Incidence of Nosocomial Infections in a Big University Affiliated Hospital in Shiraz, Iran: A Six-month Experience.

Authors:  Mehrdad Askarian; Hilda Mahmoudi; Ojan Assadian
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-03

8.  Infection after primary hip arthroplasty: a comparison of 3 Norwegian health registers.

Authors:  Håvard Dale; Inge Skråmm; Hege L Løwer; Hanne M Eriksen; Birgitte Espehaug; Ove Furnes; Finn Egil Skjeldestad; Leif I Havelin; Lars B Engesaeter
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Low rate of infected knee replacements in a nationwide series--is it an underestimate?

Authors:  Esa Jämsen; Kaisa Huotari; Heini Huhtala; Juha Nevalainen; Yrjö T Konttinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Increasing risk of prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Håvard Dale; Anne M Fenstad; Geir Hallan; Leif I Havelin; Ove Furnes; Søren Overgaard; Alma B Pedersen; Johan Kärrholm; Göran Garellick; Pekka Pulkkinen; Antti Eskelinen; Keijo Mäkelä; Lars B Engesæter
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.