Literature DB >> 17151730

Evidence that moxidectin is a greater risk factor than ivermectin in the development of resistance to macrocyclic lactones by Ostertagia spp in sheep in south eastern Australia.

D K Rendell1, T E Rentsch, J M Smith, D S Chandler, A P L Callinan.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine associations between resistance of Ostertagia (=Teladorsagia) spp to macrocyclic lactone (ML) anthelmintics and history of use of anthelmintics, by type, on commercial sheep farms in temperate regions of southern South Australia and Victoria, Australia.
METHODS: Faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRTs) were conducted during a 2.5-year period (from August 2001 to January 2004) and records of the type of anthelmintic used in the 5 years preceding the FECRTs were collected from commercial sheep farms (n=103) in southern South Australia and Victoria, and data analysed retrospectively. ML resistance was defined as <95% reduction of Ostertagia spp 10-14 days after treatment with ivermectin (IVM), orally, at half the manufacturer's recommended dose rate. Use of anthelmintics in the preceding 5 and 10 years on each property was classified according to the nett number of years each of the following classes of drug had been used: IVM oral liquid (IVO), IVM controlled-release capsules (CRCs), abamectin (ABA), moxidectin (MOX) or a non-ML anthelmintic. The prevalence of ML resistance, by property, was analysed for associations with prior use of anthelmintics.
RESULTS: Resistance by Ostertagia spp to ML anthelmintics was evident on 51/103 (49.5%) properties. The prevalence of resistance was lowest (23%) on properties on which MOX had not been used, and was significantly higher (64-77%) on properties on which MOX had been used for > or =2 of the preceding 5 years (p<0.001). In contrast, the prevalence of resistance was highest (70-74%) on the properties on which IVM, or IVM and/ or ABA, had not been used in the previous 5 years (on which the use of MOX was predominant), and was markedly lower (20- 42%) on properties that had used IVM or IVM and/or ABA for at least one of the preceding 5 years. Prevalence of resistance was higher for properties on which the only ML anthelmintic used was MOX (19/29=66%) than for those on which the only ML used was IVO (2/19=11%; p<0.001). Properties on which the only ML used was MOX were 2.72 times more likely to have resistance than properties on which the only ML used was IVO (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01-5.08).
CONCLUSION: Use of MOX for > or =2 of the preceding 5 years was associated with a higher prevalence of resistance to ML by Ostertagia spp on sheep farms in south eastern Australia than the use of IVO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17151730     DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2006.36716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Vet J        ISSN: 0048-0169            Impact factor:   1.628


  3 in total

Review 1.  Moxidectin and the avermectins: Consanguinity but not identity.

Authors:  Roger Prichard; Cécile Ménez; Anne Lespine
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Magnetic Solid-Phase Extraction Based on β-Cyclodextrins/Acrylic Acid Modified Magnetic Gelatin for Determination of Moxidectin in Milk Samples.

Authors:  Yinzhu Shang; Jing Luo; Peng Wang; Xiaoya Zhao; Cheng Ye; Shaofei Guo
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.193

3.  Most common inappropriate drug usage factors in anthelmintic treatment on sheep farms in Latvia.

Authors:  Līga Kovaļčuka; Dace Keidāne; Alīna Kļaviņa; Marta Barbara Grasberga; Armands Vekšins
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2022-02-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.