Literature DB >> 17151099

Human cytomegalovirus disrupts both ataxia telangiectasia mutated protein (ATM)- and ATM-Rad3-related kinase-mediated DNA damage responses during lytic infection.

Min Hua Luo1, Kyle Rosenke, Kamila Czornak, Elizabeth A Fortunato.   

Abstract

Many viruses (herpes simplex virus type 1, polyomavirus, and human immunodeficiency virus type 1) require the activation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated protein (ATM) and/or Mre11 for a fully permissive infection. However, the longer life cycle of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) may require more specific interactions with the DNA repair machinery to maximize viral replication. A prototypical damage response to the double-stranded ends of the incoming linear viral DNA was not observed in fibroblasts at early times postinfection (p.i.). Apparently, a constant low level of phosphorylated ATM was enough to phosphorylate its downstream targets, p53 and Nbs1. p53 was the only cellular protein observed to relocate at early times, forming foci in infected cell nuclei between 3.5 and 5.5 h p.i. Approximately half of these foci localized with input viral DNA, and all localized with viral UL112/113 prereplication site foci. No other DNA repair proteins localized with the virus or prereplication foci in the first 24 h p.i. When viral replication began in earnest, between 24 and 48 h p.i., there were large increases in steady-state levels and phosphorylation of many proteins involved in the damage response, presumably triggered by ATM-Rad3-related kinase activation. However, a sieving process occurred in which only certain proteins were specifically sequestered into viral replication centers and others were particularly excluded. In contrast to other viruses, activation of a damage response is neither necessary nor detrimental to infection, as neither ATM nor Mre11 was required for full virus replication and production. Thus, by preventing simultaneous relocalization of all the necessary repair components to the replication centers, HCMV subverts full activation and completion of both double-stranded break and S-phase checkpoints that should arrest all replication within the cell and likely lead to apoptosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17151099      PMCID: PMC1797560          DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01670-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol        ISSN: 0022-538X            Impact factor:   5.103


  93 in total

1.  Phosphorylation and rapid relocalization of 53BP1 to nuclear foci upon DNA damage.

Authors:  L Anderson; C Henderson; Y Adachi
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  In situ visualization of DNA double-strand break repair in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  B E Nelms; R S Maser; J F MacKay; M G Lagally; J H Petrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-04-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Evidence that the retroviral DNA integration process triggers an ATR-dependent DNA damage response.

Authors:  René Daniel; Gary Kao; Konstantin Taganov; James G Greger; Olga Favorova; George Merkel; Tim J Yen; Richard A Katz; Anna Marie Skalka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139.

Authors:  E P Rogakou; D R Pilch; A H Orr; V S Ivanova; W M Bonner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-03-06       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Requirement for uracil-DNA glycosylase during the transition to late-phase cytomegalovirus DNA replication.

Authors:  C T Courcelle; J Courcelle; M N Prichard; E S Mocarski
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  ATR and ATRIP: partners in checkpoint signaling.

Authors:  D Cortez; S Guntuku; J Qin; S J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-23       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Histone H2AX is phosphorylated in an ATR-dependent manner in response to replicational stress.

Authors:  I M Ward; J Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-10-22       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation.

Authors:  Christopher J Bakkenist; Michael B Kastan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Viral induction of site-specific chromosome damage.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Fortunato; Deborah H Spector
Journal:  Rev Med Virol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.989

10.  The 3' to 5' exonuclease activity of Mre 11 facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  T T Paull; M Gellert
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  80 in total

1.  Proteomic profiling of the human cytomegalovirus UL35 gene products reveals a role for UL35 in the DNA repair response.

Authors:  Jayme Salsman; Madhav Jagannathan; Patrick Paladino; Pak-Kei Chan; Graham Dellaire; Brian Raught; Lori Frappier
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Virus manipulation of cell cycle.

Authors:  R Nascimento; H Costa; R M E Parkhouse
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 3.  Is HCMV a tumor promoter?

Authors:  Liliana Soroceanu; Charles S Cobbs
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.303

4.  Consensus on the role of human cytomegalovirus in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Kristine Dziurzynski; Susan M Chang; Amy B Heimberger; Robert F Kalejta; Stuart R McGregor Dallas; Martine Smit; Liliana Soroceanu; Charles S Cobbs
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Stimulation of homology-directed repair at I-SceI-induced DNA breaks during the permissive life cycle of human cytomegalovirus.

Authors:  A S Kulkarni; E A Fortunato
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  Viral manipulation of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoints.

Authors:  Mira S Chaurushiya; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-05-26

7.  Human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B variants affect viral entry, cell fusion, and genome stability.

Authors:  Jiajia Tang; Giada Frascaroli; Robert J Lebbink; Eleonore Ostermann; Wolfram Brune
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Maintenance of large numbers of virus genomes in human cytomegalovirus-infected T98G glioblastoma cells.

Authors:  Ying-Liang Duan; Han-Qing Ye; Anamaria G Zavala; Cui-Qing Yang; Ling-Feng Miao; Bi-Shi Fu; Keun Seok Seo; Christian Davrinche; Min-Hua Luo; Elizabeth A Fortunato
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and hearing impairment: infection of fibroblast cells with HCMV induces chromosome breaks at 1q23.3, between loci DFNA7 and DFNA49 -- both involved in dominantly inherited, sensorineural, hearing impairment.

Authors:  Mona Nystad; Toril Fagerheim; Vigdis Brox; Elizabeth A Fortunato; Øivind Nilssen
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Cell cycle-independent expression of immediate-early gene 3 results in G1 and G2 arrest in murine cytomegalovirus-infected cells.

Authors:  Lüder Wiebusch; Anke Neuwirth; Linus Grabenhenrich; Sebastian Voigt; Christian Hagemeier
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.