| Literature DB >> 17150117 |
Wenbao Wang1, Linghua Kong, Heyuan Zhao, Ronghua Dong, Jing Zhou, Yun Lu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical feature, operative method and prognosis of thoracic ossification of ligamentum flavum caused by skeletal fluorosis.Entities:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17150117 PMCID: PMC1636628 DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-1-10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Figure 4The en bloc removed lamina, note the nodular ossified ligamentum flavum.
summary of the JOA scoring system for the assessment of myelopathy
| neurological status | score |
| lower-limb motor dysfunction | |
| unable to walk | 0 |
| Able to walk on flat floor with walking aid | 1 |
| Able to walk up/downstairs w/handrail | 2 |
| Lack of stability & smooth reciprocation of gait | 3 |
| no dysfunction | 4 |
| lower-limb sensory deficit | |
| severe sensory loss or pain | 0 |
| Mild sensory deficit | 1 |
| no deficit | 2 |
| trunk sensory deficit | |
| severe sensory loss or pain | 0 |
| Mild sensory deficit | 1 |
| no deficit | 2 |
| sphincter dysfunction | |
| unable to void | 0 |
| marked difficulty in micturition | 1 |
| minor difficulty in micturition | 2 |
| no dysfunction | 3 |
Total score for a healthy patient is 11.
Summary of clinical features observed in 23 patients with OLF
| Symptoms | number of cases |
| numbness and sensory deficit | 22 |
| lower-limb weakness and gait disturbance | 21 |
| Low-back pain | 8 |
| "squeezing tight band" around chest or abdomen | 6 |
| neurological claudication | 4 |
| leg pain | 12 |
| fecal & urinary incontinence | 18 |
| knee and ankle hyperreflexia | 18 |
| positive patellar and ankle clonus | 14 |
| positive Babinski sign | 15 |
Data on Patients With Ossification of Ligamentum Fluvam
| case no. | sex & age | DPS & group | JOA score | levels & segment number of OLF | levels & number of decompression | recovery rate % | |||||||||
| pre-operation | follow up | ||||||||||||||
| LEM | TS | LES | SD | Total | LEM | TS | LES | SD | total | ||||||
| 1 | M, 42 | 15m(2) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | T12–L1 (1) | T12–L1 (2) | 67 |
| 2 | M,62 | 3d(1) | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | T12–L1 (1) | T12–L1 (2) | 50 |
| 3 | F, 46 | 32m(2) | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | T12–L1 (1) | T12–L1 (2) | 75 |
| 4 | M,54 | 12m(2) | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11 | C7–T1(1) | C7–T1(2) | 100 |
| 5 | F,64 | 4y(2) | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | T1–4(3) | T1–4(4) | 80 |
| 6 | M,51 | 5y(3) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | T3–5(2) | T3–5(3) | 71 |
| 7 | M,42 | 2d(1) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | T7–12(5) | T7–12(6) | 50 |
| 8 | M,65 | 7y(3) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | T8–L1(5) | T8–T12(5) | 29 |
| 9 | M,55 | 11y(3) | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | T7–L1(5) | T8–L1(6) | 25 |
| 10 | F,56 | 15m(2) | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | T9–L1(4) | T10–L1(4) | 40 |
| 11 | M,59 | 1d(1) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | T9–L1(4) | T9–L1(5) | 0 |
| 12 | M,45 | 6m(2) | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11 | T10–L1(3) | T10–L1(4) | 100 |
| 13 | F,50 | 5y(3) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | T10–L1(3) | T10–L1(4) | 40 |
| 14* | M,62 | 1d(1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T10–L1(3) | T10–L1(4) | 0 |
| 15 | M,50 | 18m(2) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11 | T10–L1(3) | T10–L1(4) | 100 |
| 16* | F,48 | 5y(3) | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | T10–L1(3) | T10–L1(4) | 0 |
| 17 | M,54 | 1d(1) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | T3–7 | 11 | |
| T10–L1(4+3) | T10–L1(4) | ||||||||||||||
| 18 | M,59 | 8y(3) | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | T1–T5 | T1–T5(5) | 60 |
| T9–L1(4+4) | |||||||||||||||
| 19 | M,58 | 7y(3) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | T1–6 | 44 | |
| T9–L1(5+4) | T9–L1(5) | ||||||||||||||
| 20 | M,56 | 6d(1) | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | C7–T9(9) | C7–T4(5) | 33 |
| 21 | F,52 | 7m(2) | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11 | T8–12(4) | T8–12(5) | 100 |
| 22 | F,72 | 7y(3) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | T9–11 | T9–11 | 60 |
| L3–S1(2+3) | L3–S1(3+4) | ||||||||||||||
| 23 | M,58 | 4y(2) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | C3–6 | C3–6 | 57 |
| T10–L1(4+3) | T10–L1(4+4) | ||||||||||||||
DPS: duration of preoperative symptom. LEM: lower extremity motor; TS: trunk sensory; LES: lower extremity sensory; SD: sphincter dysfunction Paired t test showed that there is significant difference between the JOA score of pre-operation and followed up (P = 0.0001). The mean recover rate is 51.83%. ANOVA analysis of the three groups according to the DPS showed p = 0.0003. Further t test showed that there was significant different between group one and group tow (P = 0.0004). There was significant different between group two and group three (P = 0.003). However, there was no significant different between group one and group three (P = 0.197).
Figure 1A diagram of the OLF distribution of 23 patients.
Figure 3a, b. T1 and T2 weight MRI of thoracic spine showed continuous multi-level ossification of ligamentum flavum between T7–12. c. CT scan showed ossified ligamentum flavum, note that there was a thin gap between the ossified ligament and the lamina.
Figure 2Anteroposterior view radiograph of both forearms showed significant calcifications of interosseous membranes of forearm.
results of a multiple linear regression analysis of selected variables to predict surgical outcome
| recover rate at final follow up | ||
| Variable | coefficient | p value |
| Age | -0.24755 | 0.2548 |
| duration of preoperative symptom | -0.10367 | 0.6378 |
| Preoperative JOA score | 0.60628 | 0.0022 |
| levels of OLF | -0.31515 | 0.1430 |