Literature DB >> 17149992

The impact of different pacing strategies on five-kilometer running time trial performance.

Amy E Gosztyla1, David G Edwards, Timothy J Quinn, Robert W Kenefick.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal 1.63-km (1-mile) pacing strategy for 5-km running performance in moderately trained women distance runners. Eleven women distance runners (20.7 +/- 0.8 years, 163.8 +/- 2.0 cm, 57.0 +/- 2.2 kg, 51.7 +/- 1.0 ml.kg(-1).min(-1), 18.9 +/- 0.8% fat, 78.1 +/- 1.4% VO(2)max at lactate threshold) performed 2 preliminary 5-km time trials on a treadmill to establish baseline 5-km times. The average 1.63-km split pace of the fastest preliminary trial was manipulated for the first 1.63 km of the experimental trials and run either equal to (EVEN), 3% faster than (3%), or 6% faster than (6%) the current baseline average 1.63-km pace for each subject. Ventilation (V(E)), oxygen consumption VO(2)max )), respiratory exchange ratio, and heart rate were measured continuously. Overall 5-km times were not different (p > 0.05) for the EVEN, 3% and 6% trials finishing in 21:11 (minutes/seconds) +/- 29 seconds, 20:52 +/- 36 seconds and 20:39 +/- 29 seconds, respectively. The fastest time for 8 subjects resulted from the 6% trial and the other 3 subjects' fastest times resulted from the 3% trial. The overall exercise intensity (%VO(2)max , %VO(2)max above lactate threshold, V(E), and respiratory exchange ratio) of the first 1.63-km split was not different between the 3 and 6% trials, despite the 6% trial being 13 seconds faster than the 3% trial. Based on these findings, initial 1.63-km starting paces of a 5-km race can be 3 to 6% greater than current average race pace without negatively impacting performance. In order to optimize 5-km performance, runners should start the initial 1.63 km of a 5-km race at paces 3-6% greater than their current average race pace.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17149992     DOI: 10.1519/R-19275.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  The effect of self- even- and variable-pacing strategies on the physiological and perceptual response to cycling.

Authors:  Kevin Thomas; Mark R Stone; Kevin G Thompson; Alan St Clair Gibson; Les Ansley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The effect of an even-pacing strategy on exercise tolerance in well-trained cyclists.

Authors:  Kevin Thomas; Mark Stone; Alan St Clair Gibson; Kevin Thompson; Les Ansley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The Motivational Influence of Milestone Times on 10-km Running Performance.

Authors:  Daniel M Cushman; Ashwin Babu; Benjamin Marshall; Monica Rho
Journal:  Int J Perform Anal Sport       Date:  2016-08

4.  Deceptive Manipulation of Competitive Starting Strategies Influences Subsequent Pacing, Physiological Status, and Perceptual Responses during Cycling Time Trials.

Authors:  Emily L Williams; Hollie S Jones; S Andy Sparks; David C Marchant; Adrian W Midgley; Craig A Bridge; Lars R McNaughton
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Running pace decrease during a marathon is positively related to blood markers of muscle damage.

Authors:  Juan Del Coso; David Fernández de Velasco; David Fernández; Javier Abián-Vicen; Juan José Salinero; Cristina González-Millán; Francisco Areces; Diana Ruiz; César Gallo; Julio Calleja-González; Benito Pérez-González
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.