Literature DB >> 17149990

Any effect of gymnastics training on upper-body and lower-body aerobic and power components in national and international male gymnasts?

Monèm Jemni1, William A Sands, Françoise Friemel, Michael H Stone, Carlton B Cooke.   

Abstract

Aerobic and anaerobic performance of the upper body (UB) and lower body (LB) were assessed by arm cranking and treadmill tests respectively in a comparison of national (N) and international (I) male gymnasts. Force velocity and Wingate tests were performed using cycle ergometers for both arms and legs. In spite of a significant difference in training volume (4- 12 vs. 27-34 h.wk(-1) for N and I, respectively), there was no significant difference between N and I in aerobic and anaerobic performance. Upper body and LB maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max) values were 34.44 +/- 4.62 and 48.64 +/- 4.63 ml.kg(-1).min(-1) vs. 33.39 +/- 4.77 and 49.49 +/- 5.47 ml.kg(-1).min(-1), respectively, for N and I. Both N and I had a high lactic threshold (LT), at 76 and 82% of VO(2)max, respectively. Values for UB and LB force velocity (9.75 +/- 1.12 and 15.07 +/- 4.25 vs. 10.63 +/- 0.95 and 15.87 +/- 1.25 W.kg(-1)) and Wingate power output (10.43 +/- 0.74 and 10.98 +/- 3.06 vs. 9.58 +/- 0.60 and 13.46 +/- 1.34 W.kg(-1)) were also consistent for N and I. These findings confirm the consistency of VO(2)max values presented for gymnasts in the last 4 decades, together with an increase in peak power values. Consistent values for aerobic and anaerobic performance suggest that the significant difference in training volume is related to other aspects of perfomance that distinguish N from I gymnasts. Modern gymnastics training at N and I levels is characterized by a focus on relative strength and peak power. In the present study, the high LT is a reflection of the importance of strength training, which is consistent with research for sports such as wrestling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17149990     DOI: 10.1519/R-18525.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  14 in total

1.  Measuring fitness in female gymnasts: the gymnastics functional measurement tool.

Authors:  Mark D Sleeper; Lisa K Kenyon; Ellen Casey
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04

2.  Aerobic power and peak power of elite America's Cup sailors.

Authors:  Vernon Neville; Matthew T G Pain; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effects of baseline levels of flexibility and vertical jump ability on performance following different volumes of static stretching and potentiating exercises in elite gymnasts.

Authors:  Olyvia Donti; Charilaos Tsolakis; Gregory C Bogdanis
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  MEASURING SPORT-SPECIFIC PHYSICAL ABILITIES IN MALE GYMNASTS: THE MEN'S GYMNASTICS FUNCTIONAL MEASUREMENT TOOL.

Authors:  Mark D Sleeper; Lisa K Kenyon; James M Elliott; M Samuel Cheng
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-12

5.  Sex and Age-Group Differences in Strength, Jump, Speed, Flexibility, and Endurance Performances of Swedish Elite Gymnasts Competing in TeamGym.

Authors:  Stefan Höög; Erik P Andersson
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2021-05-13

6.  Development of a specific anaerobic field test for aerobic gymnastics.

Authors:  Christiano Robles Rodrigues Alves; Marcello Tadeu Caetano Borelli; Vitor de Salles Paineli; Rafael de Almeida Azevedo; Claudia Cristine Gomes Borelli; Antônio Herbert Lancha Junior; Bruno Gualano; Guilherme Giannini Artioli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effect of Plyometric Training on Handspring Vault Performance and Functional Power in Youth Female Gymnasts.

Authors:  Emma Hall; Daniel C Bishop; Thomas I Gee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Usefulness and metabolic implications of a 60-second repeated jumps test as a predictor of acrobatic jumping performance in gymnasts.

Authors:  M Marina; F A Rodríguez
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 2.806

9.  Physiological demands of young women's competitive gymnastic routines.

Authors:  M Marina; F A Rodríguez
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.806

Review 10.  Stretching the Spines of Gymnasts: A Review.

Authors:  William A Sands; Jeni R McNeal; Gabriella Penitente; Steven Ross Murray; Lawrence Nassar; Monèm Jemni; Satoshi Mizuguchi; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.