Literature DB >> 17149946

Hospital nursing satisfaction with clinical laboratory services: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 162 institutions.

Bruce A Jones1, Molly K Walsh, Stephen G Ruby.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Monitoring customer satisfaction is an important and useful quality improvement tool and is required of most clinical laboratories in the United States.
OBJECTIVE: To survey the level of nursing satisfaction with hospital clinical laboratory services.
DESIGN: Participating laboratories provided information regarding laboratory demographics and practices. These laboratories then surveyed hospital nursing personnel regarding their level of satisfaction with defined aspects of laboratory service.
SETTING: College of American Pathologists Q-Probes laboratory quality improvement study in 162 hospital laboratories. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nursing overall satisfaction score (ranging from 1, not satisfied, to 5, very satisfied) and satisfaction scores for 13 specific aspects of clinical laboratory services.
RESULTS: One hundred sixty-two institutions submitted data from a total of 7033 nursing surveys. The overall satisfaction score for all institutions ranged from 2.5 to 4.6. The median overall score for all participants was 3.9 (10th percentile, 3.2; 90th percentile, 4.2). Nursing personnel were most satisfied with the accuracy of test results, phlebotomy courtesy toward patients and nursing staff, and notification of abnormal results. They were least satisfied with stat test turnaround time, laboratory management responsiveness and accessibility, phlebotomy responsiveness to service requests, and routine test turnaround time. The most important aspect of laboratory service reported by nursing personnel was stat test turnaround time.
CONCLUSIONS: Most nursing personnel are satisfied with the clinical laboratory services that are provided to the patients in their care. Although test result accuracy is very highly regarded, there is room for improvement in several aspects of service, particularly in test turnaround time and laboratory management accessibility and responsiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17149946     DOI: 10.5858/2006-130-1756-HNSWCL

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  6 in total

1.  Laboratory turnaround time.

Authors:  Robert C Hawkins
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2007-11

Review 2.  Turnaround Time (TAT): Difference in Concept for Laboratory and Clinician.

Authors:  Hara P Pati; Gurmeet Singh
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Customer satisfaction survey with clinical laboratory and phlebotomy services at a tertiary care unit level.

Authors:  Young Rae Koh; Shine Young Kim; In Suk Kim; Chulhun L Chang; Eun Yup Lee; Han Chul Son; Hyung Hoi Kim
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Evaluation of the Barricor Tube in 28 Routine Chemical Tests and Its Impact on Turnaround Time in an Outpatient Clinic.

Authors:  Soo Young Moon; Han Sol Lee; Min Soon Park; In-Suk Kim; Sun Min Lee
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Dissatisfaction with the laboratory services in conducting HIV related testing among public and private medical personnel in Tanzania.

Authors:  S G Mfinanga; A Kahwa; G Kimaro; A Kilale; S Kivuyo; M Senkoro; B Ngowi; R Mtandu; B Mutayoba; E Ngadaya; K Mashoto
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Translation of proteomic biomarkers into FDA approved cancer diagnostics: issues and challenges.

Authors:  Anna K Füzéry; Joshua Levin; Maria M Chan; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.988

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.