Literature DB >> 17149799

Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited.

Eugene Demidenko1.   

Abstract

There is no consensus on the approach to compute the power and sample size with logistic regression. Some authors use the likelihood ratio test; some use the test on proportions; some suggest various approximations to handle the multivariate case. We advocate the use of the Wald test since the Z-score is routinely used for statistical significance testing of regression coefficients. The null-variance formula became popular from early studies, which contradicts modern software, which utilizes the method of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), when the variance of the MLE is estimated at the MLE, not at the null. We derive general Wald-based power and sample size formulas for logistic regression and then apply them to binary exposure and confounder to obtain a closed-form expression. These formulas are applied to minimize the total sample size in a case-control study to achieve a given power by optimizing the ratio of controls to cases. Approximately, the optimal number of controls to cases is equal to the square root of the alternative odds ratio. Our sample size and power calculations can be carried out online at www.dartmouth.edu/ approximately eugened.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17149799     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  88 in total

1.  A two-stage strategy to accommodate general patterns of confounding in the design of observational studies.

Authors:  Sebastien Haneuse; Jonathan Schildcrout; Daniel Gillen
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Deficits in reach target selection during inactivation of the midbrain superior colliculus.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Robert D Rafal; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Interpretation of Statistical Power after the Data have been Gathered.

Authors:  John J Dziak; Lisa C Dierker; Beau Abar
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2018-10-02

4.  Optimal design strategies for sibling studies with binary exposures.

Authors:  Zhigang Li; Ian W McKeague; Lambert H Lumey
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Approximations of the power functions for Wald, likelihood ratio, and score tests and their applications to linear and logistic regressions.

Authors:  Eugene Demidenko
Journal:  Model Assist Stat Appl       Date:  2020-12-25

6.  Universal health insurance and equity in primary care and specialist office visits: a population-based study.

Authors:  Richard H Glazier; Mohammad M Agha; Rahim Moineddin; Lyn M Sibley
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Did changes in drug reimbursement after the medicare modernization act affect chemotherapy prescribing?

Authors:  Mark C Hornbrook; Jennifer Malin; Jane C Weeks; Solomon B Makgoeng; Nancy L Keating; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Prophylactic Antiepileptic Drug Use and Outcome in the Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Study.

Authors:  Kevin N Sheth; Sharyl R Martini; Charles J Moomaw; Sebastian Koch; Mitchell S V Elkind; Gene Sung; Steven J Kittner; Michael Frankel; Jonathan Rosand; Carl D Langefeld; Mary E Comeau; Salina P Waddy; Jennifer Osborne; Daniel Woo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Refining the Candidate Environment: Interpersonal Stress, the Serotonin Transporter Polymorphism, and Gene-Environment Interactions in Major Depression.

Authors:  Suzanne Vrshek-Schallhorn; Susan Mineka; Richard E Zinbarg; Michelle G Craske; James W Griffith; Jonathan Sutton; Eva E Redei; Kate Wolitzky-Taylor; Constance Hammen; Emma K Adam
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-08-26

10.  What Factors are Predictive of Patient-reported Outcomes? A Prospective Study of 337 Shoulder Arthroplasties.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Stacy M Russ; Phuong T Vu; Jason E Hsu; Robert M Lucas; Bryan A Comstock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.