Literature DB >> 17149648

Follow-up costs up to 5 years after conventional treatments in patients with cartilage lesions of the knee.

H Upmeier1, B Brüggenjürgen, A Weiler, C Flamme, H Laprell, S N Willich.   

Abstract

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we contacted patients who had been diagnosed with (and, if necessary, treated for) knee cartilage defects by arthroscopy at one of seven treatment centres in Germany between 1997 and 2001. In early 2003, patients completed a questionnaire on the health care resources they had used since the time of the arthroscopy. Based on this information, we determined follow-up costs. Data from a total of 1,708 patients were included in the final analysis. Of these, 1,070 were assigned to the initial operation (IO) group (61% men, 49+/-15 years; 39% women, 52+/-14 years) and 638 were assigned to the re-operation (RO) group (64% men, 44+/-13 years; 36% women, 47+/-14 years). The cumulative direct medical costs caused by knee complaints for the first 5 years following the arthroscopy were 1,984 Euro for the IO population and 4,203 Euro for the RO population. The cumulative indirect costs (i.e. costs associated with loss of productivity), however, amounted to 7,669 Euro and 15,265 Euro, respectively, and were thus almost four times as high as the cumulative direct costs. This is the first study that quantifies the considerable follow-up costs in patients who have undergone surgery for knee cartilage defects. As such, it may provide a yardstick for future treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17149648     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0182-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  24 in total

Review 1.  Health economics and orthopaedics.

Authors:  N Maniadakis; A Gray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-01

Review 2.  A review of health-related workplace productivity loss instruments.

Authors:  Jennifer H Lofland; Laura Pizzi; Kevin D Frick
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  The healing and regeneration of articular cartilage.

Authors:  S W O'Driscoll
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  An update on the epidemiology of knee and hip osteoarthritis with a view to prevention.

Authors:  D T Felson; Y Zhang
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1998-08

5.  Joint injury in young adults and risk for subsequent knee and hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  A C Gelber; M C Hochberg; L A Mead; N Y Wang; F M Wigley; M J Klag
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-09-05       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  The cost diary: a method to measure direct and indirect costs in cost-effectiveness research.

Authors:  M E Goossens; M P Rutten-van Mölken; J W Vlaeyen; S M van der Linden
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Acute injury of the articular cartilage and subchondral bone: a common but unrecognized lesion in the immature knee.

Authors:  Rachel S Oeppen; Susan A Connolly; Jenny T Bencardino; Diego Jaramillo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  [Comparison of costs-of-illness in a year before and after inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation in persons with spinal disorders].

Authors:  S Merkesdal; K Bernitt; T Busche; J Bauer; W Mau
Journal:  Rehabilitation (Stuttg)       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.113

9.  Chondrocyte implantation in the repair of chondral lesions of the knee: economics and quality of life.

Authors:  T Minas
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  1998-11

Review 10.  Bone and joint diseases around the world. Sweden: a brief update on burden and priority.

Authors:  Kristina Akesson
Journal:  J Rheumatol Suppl       Date:  2003-08
View more
  6 in total

1.  Increasing age and female gender are associated with early knee replacement following arthroscopy.

Authors:  Simon S Jameson; Stephen P Rushton; Daniel Dowen; Paul Baker; Philip James; Mike R Reed; David Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  New approach for predictive measurement of knee cartilage defects with three-dimensional printing based on CT-arthrography: A feasibility study.

Authors:  R Michalik; S Schrading; T Dirrichs; A Prescher; C K Kuhl; M Tingart; B Rath
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-10-31

Review 3.  Bioactive scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration.

Authors:  Cuijun Deng; Jiang Chang; Chengtie Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Neuromapping of the Capsuloligamentous Knee Joint Structures.

Authors:  Andreas Martin Seitz; Miriam Murrmann; Anita Ignatius; Lutz Dürselen; Benedikt Friemert; Falk von Lübken
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-23

Review 5.  Returning to Work After Articular Cartilage Repair Intervention: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Puwapong Nimkingratana; Mats Brittberg
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-03-13

Review 6.  Health Economic Evaluations of Hip and Knee Interventions in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Codie A Primeau; Bryn O Zomar; Lyndsay E Somerville; Ishita Joshi; J Robert Giffin; Jacquelyn D Marsh
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.