OBJECTIVE: The currently used tumor-node metastasis (TNM) staging method is generally not applicable to patients with unresectable esophageal carcinomas. There is a need for both an efficient, easy-to-perform clinical classification and for identification of pretherapeutic prognostic factors that would be useful for oncologists, one of which is tumor volume. METHODS: Records of 148 patients, admitted to hospital during the period January 1993 to December 2001, were evaluated retrospectively. Median age was 65.7 years (range, 35.5-85.5 years). Most patients had SCC (84.5%). Using the computed tomography (CT) scan classification, tumors were recorded as follows: 1 T1, 42 T2, 93 T3, 6 T4, 2 Nx, 72 N0, 74 N1. Tumor volume from the CT scans was determined as the sum of 2 opposed truncated cones. Median tumor volume was 57.5 cm3 (range, 0.6-288 cm3). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 15.1 month (range, 0.3-82.8 months). Survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 42.5%, 21.6%, and 8%, respectively. Prognostic factors identified by univariate analysis were: dysphagia grade > or =2, other histology than squamous cell, tumor location below the carina, age <65 years and tumor volume > or =100 cm3. Prognostic factors identified with multivariate analysis were: dysphagia grade > or =2 (P = 0.013), weight loss > or =10% (P = 0.047), tumor location below the carina (P = 0.002), and tumor volume > or =100 cm3 (P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: For patients that the TNM staging system is not applicable, tumor volume is a new powerful determinant of survival. Further clinical trials need to be carried out to validate this prospectively.
OBJECTIVE: The currently used tumor-node metastasis (TNM) staging method is generally not applicable to patients with unresectable esophageal carcinomas. There is a need for both an efficient, easy-to-perform clinical classification and for identification of pretherapeutic prognostic factors that would be useful for oncologists, one of which is tumor volume. METHODS: Records of 148 patients, admitted to hospital during the period January 1993 to December 2001, were evaluated retrospectively. Median age was 65.7 years (range, 35.5-85.5 years). Most patients had SCC (84.5%). Using the computed tomography (CT) scan classification, tumors were recorded as follows: 1 T1, 42 T2, 93 T3, 6 T4, 2 Nx, 72 N0, 74 N1. Tumor volume from the CT scans was determined as the sum of 2 opposed truncated cones. Median tumor volume was 57.5 cm3 (range, 0.6-288 cm3). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 15.1 month (range, 0.3-82.8 months). Survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 42.5%, 21.6%, and 8%, respectively. Prognostic factors identified by univariate analysis were: dysphagia grade > or =2, other histology than squamous cell, tumor location below the carina, age <65 years and tumor volume > or =100 cm3. Prognostic factors identified with multivariate analysis were: dysphagia grade > or =2 (P = 0.013), weight loss > or =10% (P = 0.047), tumor location below the carina (P = 0.002), and tumor volume > or =100 cm3 (P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: For patients that the TNM staging system is not applicable, tumor volume is a new powerful determinant of survival. Further clinical trials need to be carried out to validate this prospectively.
Authors: Christopher P Twine; S Ashley Roberts; Wyn G Lewis; B Vicki Dave; Claire E Rawlinson; David Chan; Mark Robinson; Tom D Crosby Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: S Shen; J L Araujo; N K Altorki; J R Sonett; A Rodriguez; K Sungur-Stasik; C F Spinelli; A I Neugut; J A Abrams Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 3.429
Authors: Charles Lemarignier; Frédéric Di Fiore; Charline Marre; Sébastien Hapdey; Romain Modzelewski; Pierrick Gouel; Pierre Michel; Bernard Dubray; Pierre Vera Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-07-19 Impact factor: 9.236