Literature DB >> 17148822

Derivative-free generation and interpolation of convex Pareto optimal IMRT plans.

Aswin L Hoffmann1, Alex Y D Siem, Dick den Hertog, Johannes H A M Kaanders, Henk Huizenga.   

Abstract

In inverse treatment planning for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), beamlet intensity levels in fluence maps of high-energy photon beams are optimized. Treatment plan evaluation criteria are used as objective functions to steer the optimization process. Fluence map optimization can be considered a multi-objective optimization problem, for which a set of Pareto optimal solutions exists: the Pareto efficient frontier (PEF). In this paper, a constrained optimization method is pursued to iteratively estimate the PEF up to some predefined error. We use the property that the PEF is convex for a convex optimization problem to construct piecewise-linear upper and lower bounds to approximate the PEF from a small initial set of Pareto optimal plans. A derivative-free Sandwich algorithm is presented in which these bounds are used with three strategies to determine the location of the next Pareto optimal solution such that the uncertainty in the estimated PEF is maximally reduced. We show that an intelligent initial solution for a new Pareto optimal plan can be obtained by interpolation of fluence maps from neighbouring Pareto optimal plans. The method has been applied to a simplified clinical test case using two convex objective functions to map the trade-off between tumour dose heterogeneity and critical organ sparing. All three strategies produce representative estimates of the PEF. The new algorithm is particularly suitable for dynamic generation of Pareto optimal plans in interactive treatment planning.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17148822     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/24/005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Sensitivity analysis for lexicographic ordering in radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  T Long; M Matuszak; M Feng; B A Fraass; R K Ten Haken; H E Romeijn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein; Ben J M Heijmen; Dirk Verellen; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  The minimum knowledge base for predicting organ-at-risk dose-volume levels and plan-related complications in IMRT planning.

Authors:  Hao H Zhang; Robert R Meyer; Leyuan Shi; Warren D D'Souza
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Improved planning time and plan quality through multicriteria optimization for intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  David L Craft; Theodore S Hong; Helen A Shih; Thomas R Bortfeld
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Evaluation of the optimal combinations of modulation factor and pitch for Helical TomoTherapy plans made with TomoEdge using Pareto optimal fronts.

Authors:  Geert De Kerf; Dirk Van Gestel; Lobke Mommaerts; Danielle Van den Weyngaert; Dirk Verellen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Comparing planning time, delivery time and plan quality for IMRT, RapidArc and Tomotherapy.

Authors:  Mike Oliver; Will Ansbacher; Wayne A Beckham
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.