Literature DB >> 17148629

Discovery of breast cancers within 1 year of a normal screening mammogram: how are they found?

Patricia A Carney1, Elizabeth Steiner, Martha E Goodrich, Allen J Dietrich, Claudia J Kasales, Julia E Weiss, Todd MacKenzie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to determine how breast cancers that occur within 1 year after a normal mammogram are discovered.
METHODS: Using population-based mammography registry data from 2000-2002, we identified 143 women with interval breast cancers and 481 women with screen-detected breast cancers. We surveyed women's primary care clinicians to assess how the interval breast cancers were found and factors associated with their discovery.
RESULTS: Women with interval cancers were twice as likely to have a personal history of breast cancer (30.1%) as women with screen-detected cancers (13.6%). Among women with interval cancers, one half of the invasive tumors (49.5%) were discovered when women initiated a health care visit because of a breast concern, and 16.8% were discovered when a clinician found an area of concern while conducting a routine clinical breast examination. Having a lump and both a personal and a family history of breast cancer was the most common reason why women initiated a health care visit (44%) (P <.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Women with interval cancers are most likely to initiate a visit to a primary care clinician when they have 2 or more breast concerns. These concerns are most likely to include having a lump and a personal and/or family history of breast cancer. Women at highest risk for breast cancer may need closer surveillance by their primary care clinicians and may benefit from a strong educational message to come for a visit as soon as they find a lump.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17148629      PMCID: PMC1687155          DOI: 10.1370/afm.580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  18 in total

1.  The New Hampshire Mammography Network: the development and design of a population-based registry.

Authors:  P A Carney; S P Poplack; W A Wells; B Littenberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Mammographic density in women on postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  W Leung; F Goldberg; B Zee; E Sterns
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske; P A Carney; B Geller; M T Mandelson; S H Taplin; K Malvin; V Ernster; N Urban; G Cutter; R Rosenberg; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  A blind review and an informed review of interval breast cancer cases in the Limburg screening programme, the Netherlands.

Authors:  J M de Rijke; L J Schouten; J L Schreutelkamp; I Jochem; A L Verbeek
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  Tumour characteristics and survival in patients with invasive interval breast cancer classified according to mammographic findings at the latest screening: a comparison of true interval and missed interval cancers.

Authors:  B Vitak; K E Olsen; J C Månson; L G Arnesson; O Stål
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Biologic characteristics of interval and screen-detected breast cancers.

Authors:  F D Gilliland; N Joste; P M Stauber; W C Hunt; R Rosenberg; G Redlich; C R Key
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-05-03       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  US women's attitudes to false-positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  L M Schwartz; S Woloshin; H C Sox; B Fischhoff; H G Welch
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-11

8.  A study of interval breast cancer within the NHS breast screening programme.

Authors:  W K Cowan; B Angus; J C Gray; L G Lunt; S R al-Tamimi
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Efficacy of breast cancer screening in the community according to risk level.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Lisa M Reisch; Mary B Barton; William E Barlow; Sharon Rolnick; Emily L Harris; Lisa J Herrinton; Ann M Geiger; R Kevin Beverly; Gene Hart; Onchee Yu; Sarah M Greene; Noel S Weiss; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Interval breast cancer: a more aggressive subset of breast neoplasias.

Authors:  R DeGroote; B F Rush; J Milazzo; M J Warden; J M Rocko
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  2 in total

1.  Incidence, detection, and tumour stage of breast cancer in a cohort of Italian women with negative screening mammography report recommending early (short-interval) rescreen.

Authors:  Alessandra Ravaioli; Flavia Foca; Americo Colamartini; Fabio Falcini; Carlo Naldoni; Alba C Finarelli; Priscilla Sassoli de Bianchi; Lauro Bucchi
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  Could screening participation bias symptom interpretation? An interview study on women's interpretations of and responses to cancer symptoms between mammography screening rounds.

Authors:  Marit Solbjør; John-Arne Skolbekken; Ann Rudinow Sætnan; Anne Irene Hagen; Siri Forsmo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.