MOTIVATION: Affymetrix GeneChip arrays require summarization in order to combine the probe-level intensities into one value representing the expression level of a gene. However, probe intensity measurements are expected to be affected by different levels of non-specific- and cross-hybridization to non-specific transcripts. Here, we present a new summarization technique, the Distribution Free Weighted method (DFW), which uses information about the variability in probe behavior to estimate the extent of non-specific and cross-hybridization for each probe. The contribution of the probe is weighted accordingly during summarization, without making any distributional assumptions for the probe-level data. RESULTS: We compare DFW with several popular summarization methods on spike-in datasets, via both our own calculations and the 'Affycomp II' competition. The results show that DFW outperforms other methods when sensitivity and specificity are considered simultaneously. With the Affycomp spike-in datasets, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for DFW is nearly 1.0 (a perfect value), indicating that DFW can identify all differentially expressed genes with a few false positives. The approach used is also computationally faster than most other methods in current use. AVAILABILITY: The R code for DFW is available upon request. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: Affymetrix GeneChip arrays require summarization in order to combine the probe-level intensities into one value representing the expression level of a gene. However, probe intensity measurements are expected to be affected by different levels of non-specific- and cross-hybridization to non-specific transcripts. Here, we present a new summarization technique, the Distribution Free Weighted method (DFW), which uses information about the variability in probe behavior to estimate the extent of non-specific and cross-hybridization for each probe. The contribution of the probe is weighted accordingly during summarization, without making any distributional assumptions for the probe-level data. RESULTS: We compare DFW with several popular summarization methods on spike-in datasets, via both our own calculations and the 'Affycomp II' competition. The results show that DFW outperforms other methods when sensitivity and specificity are considered simultaneously. With the Affycomp spike-in datasets, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for DFW is nearly 1.0 (a perfect value), indicating that DFW can identify all differentially expressed genes with a few false positives. The approach used is also computationally faster than most other methods in current use. AVAILABILITY: The R code for DFW is available upon request. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: R Schachtner; D Lutter; P Knollmüller; A M Tomé; F J Theis; G Schmitz; M Stetter; P Gómez Vilda; E W Lang Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2008-06-05 Impact factor: 6.937