Literature DB >> 17148369

Sex allocation theory aids species conservation.

Bruce C Robertson1, Graeme P Elliott, Daryl K Eason, Mick N Clout, Neil J Gemmell.   

Abstract

Supplementary feeding is often a key tool in the intensive management of captive and threatened species. Although it can increase such parameters as breeding frequency and individual survival, supplementary feeding may produce undesirable side effects that increase overall extinction risk. Recent attempts to increase breeding frequency and success in the kakapo Strigops habroptilus using supplementary feeding inadvertently resulted in highly male-biased chick sex ratios. Here, we describe how the inclusion of sex allocation theory has remedied this conservation dilemma. Our study is the first to manipulate chick sex ratios in an endangered species by altering maternal condition and highlights the importance of incorporating evolutionary theory into modern conservation practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17148369      PMCID: PMC1618899          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  5 in total

1.  Constraints in the evolution of sex ratio adjustment.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Offspring sex ratios in tree swallows: females in better condition produce more sons.

Authors:  L A Whittingham; P O Dunn
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Facultative primary sex ratio variation: a lack of evidence in birds?

Authors:  John G Ewen; Phillip Cassey; Anders P Møller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Experimental demonstration that offspring sex ratio varies with maternal condition.

Authors:  R G Nager; P Monaghan; R Griffiths; D C Houston; R Dawson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring.

Authors:  R L Trivers; D E Willard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total
  13 in total

1.  Watching sexy displays improves hatching success and offspring growth through maternal allocation.

Authors:  Adeline Loyau; Frédéric Lacroix
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Linking ecology, behaviour and conservation: does habitat saturation change the mating system of bearded vultures?

Authors:  Martina Carrete; José A Donázar; Antoni Margalida; Joan Bertran
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Maternal nutrition affects reproductive output and sex allocation in a lizard with environmental sex determination.

Authors:  Daniel A Warner; Matthew B Lovern; Richard Shine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Birds bias offspring sex ratio in response to livestock grazing.

Authors:  Gina L Prior; Darren M Evans; Stephen Redpath; Simon J Thirgood; Pat Monaghan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Exposure to high male density causes maternal stress and female-biased sex ratios in a mammal.

Authors:  Renée C Firman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Extreme sex ratio variation in relation to change in condition around conception.

Authors:  Elissa Z Cameron; Wayne L Linklater
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Can an introduced predator select for adaptive sex allocation?

Authors:  R Heinsohn; J Au; H Kokko; M H Webb; R M Deans; R Crates; D Stojanovic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Demographic and phenotypic effects of human mediated trophic subsidy on a large Australian lizard (Varanus varius): meal ticket or last supper?

Authors:  Tim S Jessop; Peter Smissen; Franciscus Scheelings; Tim Dempster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Improving supplementary feeding in species conservation.

Authors:  John G Ewen; Leila Walker; Stefano Canessa; Jim J Groombridge
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 6.560

10.  Population sex ratios: another consideration in the reintroduction - reinforcement debate?

Authors:  Sergio A Lambertucci; Martina Carrete; Karina L Speziale; Fernando Hiraldo; José Antonio Donázar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.