Literature DB >> 17148363

Limited male incubation ability and the evolution of egg size in shorebirds.

Terje Lislevand1, Gavin H Thomas.   

Abstract

In bird species where males incubate but are smaller than females, egg size may be constrained by male body size, and hence ability to incubate the eggs. Using data from 71 such shorebird species, we show that egg size decreases as the degree of female-biased sexual size dimorphism increases, after controlling for female body mass. Relative egg size was not related to mean clutch size. However, when controlling for mating system, the relationship between female-biased sexual size dimorphism and relative egg size was only significant in polyandrous species. The relatively small eggs of socially polyandrous shorebirds have previously been explained as an energy-saving strategy associated with the production of multiple clutches. Our findings suggest that egg size evolution is better explained by male incubation limitation in these birds.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17148363      PMCID: PMC1618901          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  9 in total

Review 1.  Avian egg size: variation within species and inflexibility within individuals.

Authors:  Julian K Christians
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2002-02

2.  Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of size dimorphism in shorebirds.

Authors:  Tamás Székely; Robert P Freckleton; John D Reynolds
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Prenatal developmental conditions have long-term effects on offspring fecundity.

Authors:  Helen E Gorman; Ruedi G Nager
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution.

Authors:  M Pagel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence.

Authors:  R P Freckleton; P H Harvey; M Pagel
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Why don't birds lay more eggs?

Authors:  P Monaghan; R G Nager
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Avian incubation.

Authors:  F N White; J L Kinney
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-10-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Intraspecific variation in egg size and egg composition in birds: effects on offspring fitness.

Authors:  T D Williams
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1994-02

9.  A supertree approach to shorebird phylogeny.

Authors:  Gavin H Thomas; Matthew A Wills; Tamás Székely
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 3.260

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Delayed egg-laying and shortened incubation duration of Arctic-breeding shorebirds coincide with climate cooling.

Authors:  Eunbi Kwon; Willow B English; Emily L Weiser; Samantha E Franks; David J Hodkinson; David B Lank; Brett K Sandercock
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 2.912

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.