Literature DB >> 17148243

Frequency-dependent taste-rejection by avian predation may select for defence chemical polymorphisms in aposematic prey.

John Skelhorn1, Candy Rowe.   

Abstract

Chemically defended insects advertise their unpalatability to avian predators using conspicuous aposematic coloration that predators learn to avoid. Insects utilize a wide variety of different compounds in their defences, and intraspecific variation in defence chemistry is common. We propose that polymorphisms in insect defence chemicals may be beneficial to insects by increasing survival from avian predators. Birds learn to avoid a colour signal faster when individual prey possesses one of two unpalatable chemicals rather than all prey having the same defence chemical. However, for chemical polymorphisms to evolve within a species, there must be benefits that allow rare chemical morphs to increase in frequency. Using domestic chicks as predators and coloured crumbs for prey, we provide evidence that birds taste and reject proportionally more of the individuals with rare defence chemicals than those with common defence chemicals. This indicates that the way in which birds attack and reject prey could enhance the survival of rare chemical morphs and select for chemical polymorphism in aposematic species. This is the first experiment to demonstrate that predators can directly influence the form taken by prey's chemical defences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17148243      PMCID: PMC1626375          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  8 in total

1.  Tasting the difference: do multiple defence chemicals interact in Müllerian mimicry?

Authors:  John Skelhorn; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Automimicry destabilizes aposematism: predator sample-and-reject behaviour may provide a solution.

Authors:  Gabriella Gamberale-Stille; Tim Guilford
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Selective predation on chemically defended chrysomelid larvae : A Conditioning Process.

Authors:  J M Pasteels; J C Gregoire
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Genetic component of variation in chemical defense ofOreina gloriosa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).

Authors:  F Eggenberger; M Rowell-Rahier
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  SURVIVAL OF DISTASTEFUL INSECTS AFTER BEING ATTACKED BY NAIVE BIRDS: A REAPPRAISAL OF THE THEORY OF APOSEMATIC COLORATION EVOLVING THROUGH INDIVIDUAL SELECTION.

Authors:  Christer Wiklund; Torbjörn Järvi
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Higher survival of an aposematic than of a cryptic form of a distasteful bug.

Authors:  Birgitta Sillén-Tullberg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Plant-determined variation in the cardenolide content, thin-layer chromatography profiles, and emetic potency of monarch butterflies,Danaus plexippus L. Reared on milkweed plants in California: 2.Asclepias speciosa.

Authors:  L P Brower; J N Seiber; C J Nelson; S P Lynch; M M Holland
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Distribution of autogenous and host-derived chemical defenses inOreina leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).

Authors:  J M Pasteels; S Dobler; M Rowell-Rahier; A Ehmke; T Hartmann
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.626

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Condition dependence in biosynthesized chemical defenses of an aposematic and mimetic Heliconius butterfly.

Authors:  Anniina L K Mattila; Chris D Jiggins; Marjo Saastamoinen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Activation of the Nucleus Taeniae of the Amygdala by Umami Taste in Domestic Chicks (Gallus gallus).

Authors:  Francesca Protti-Sánchez; Carlos Daniel Corrales Parada; Uwe Mayer; Hannah M Rowland
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Better the devil you know: avian predators find variation in prey toxicity aversive.

Authors:  Craig A Barnett; Melissa Bateson; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Evolutionary and ecological processes influencing chemical defense variation in an aposematic and mimetic Heliconius butterfly.

Authors:  Anniina L K Mattila; Chris D Jiggins; Øystein H Opedal; Gabriela Montejo-Kovacevich; Érika C Pinheiro de Castro; W Owen McMillan; Caroline Bacquet; Marjo Saastamoinen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Conformational and functional effects induced by D- and L-amino acid epimerization on a single gene encoded peptide from the skin secretion of Hypsiboas punctatus.

Authors:  Mariana T Q de Magalhães; Eder A Barbosa; Maura V Prates; Rodrigo M Verly; Victor Hugo O Munhoz; Ivan E de Araújo; Carlos Bloch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.