Literature DB >> 17147088

The bowel cleansing for colonoscopy. A randomized trial comparing three methods.

Luigi De Salvo1, Giacomo Borgonovo, Gian Luca Ansaldo, Emanuela Varaldo, Francesco Floris, Michela Assalino, Fabio Gianiorio.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopy is the procedure of choice for the detection and ablation of small lesions o the colonic mucosa. A proper bowel cleansing is mandatory. So far several regimens have been proposed but rather none has shown a clear-cut advantage over the others. Aim of this study was to compare cleansing ability and patients' compliance of three oral regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two-hundred and seventy-three patients were block randomised into three groups. Group A (92 patients) received tablets containing senna 12 mg and Magnesium Sulphate 15 mg the day before colonoscopy. Group B (98 patients) received a Polyethylene Glycol-based solution of two litres plus 4 tablets of Bisacodyl the day before the exam. Group C (83 patients) received Sodium Phosphate 40 milliliters the day before and the day of colonoscopy. Results of 265 patients were available for the analysis. Eight patients were excluded because inability to follow prescription. The lower incidence of constipation in group C was not significant. The other parameters were homogeneously distributed in the three groups.
RESULTS: The 79 patients of the group C achieved a better bowel cleansing as compared with the 90 of group A (p = 0.0003) and the 96 of group B (p = 0.034). Constipated patients had a significantly better cleansing with Sodium Phosphate preparation compared with senna plus Magnesium Sulphate (p = 0.017), but not significantly better compared with Golytely solution. Compliance and rate of total colonoscopy performed were not statistically different in the three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Sodium Phosphate solution gave better bowel preparation, with the same compliance, than either senna or Polyethylene solution. In constipated patients Sodium Phosphate showed good efficacy resulting in good cleansing rates similar to that of non-constipated patients. The poor results obtained by Polyethylene were related to the little amount of solution taken even if associated to Bisacodyl.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17147088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Ital Chir        ISSN: 0003-469X            Impact factor:   0.766


  5 in total

1.  Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: a treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ravi Juluri; George Eckert; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Oral colorectal cleansing preparations in adults.

Authors:  Sherief Shawki; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Sodium phosphate is superior to polyethylene glycol in constipated patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jerry T Dang; Muhammad Moolla; ThucNhi Tran Dang; Ashley Shaw; Chunhong Tian; Shahzeer Karmali; Richard Sultanian
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Systematic Review: Outcomes by Duration of NPO Status prior to Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Aasma Shaukat; Ashish Malhotra; Nancy Greer; Roderick MacDonald; Joseph Wels; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 5.  Oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Mengyang Shi; Zhongli Liao; Weiqing Chen; Yongzhong Wu; Xu Tian
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 6.337

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.