Literature DB >> 17146978

P-value calculation for multistage phase II cancer clinical trials.

Sin-Ho Jung1, Kouros Owzar, Stephen L George, Taiyeong Lee.   

Abstract

Due to ethical and practical issues, clinical trials are conducted in multiple stages, but the reported p-values often fail to reflect the design aspect of the trials. We investigate some approaches to p-value calculation in analyzing multi-stage Phase II clinical trials that have a binary variable, such as response, as the primary endpoint. The sample space consists of the paired outcomes of the stopping stage and the number of responses, which jointly define a complete and sufficient statistic for the true binomial proportion. Calculating a p-value requires an ordering of the paired outcomes so that outcomes more extreme than the observed can be identified. We consider the orderings based on the maximum likelihood estimator and the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator. We will compare, using some examples, the p-values based on these alternative orderings and the one ignoring the multistage design aspect of phase II trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17146978     DOI: 10.1080/10543400600825645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  13 in total

1.  Approaches to handling data when a phase II trial deviates from the pre-specified Simon's two-stage design.

Authors:  Yujun Wu; Weichung J Shih
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Phase II trial of capecitabine and everolimus (RAD001) combination in refractory gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Su Jin Lee; Jongtae Lee; Jeeyun Lee; Se Hoon Park; Joon Oh Park; Young Suk Park; Ho Yeong Lim; Kyoung-Mee Kim; In-Gu Do; Sin-Ho Jung; Dong-Seok Yim; Won Ki Kang
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 3.  Statistical issues for design and analysis of single-arm multi-stage phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Sin-Ho Jung
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Phase II cancer clinical trials with heterogeneous patient populations.

Authors:  Sin-Ho Jung; Myron N Chang; Sun J Kang
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 5.  Sources of bias for single-arm phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Sin-Ho Jung
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-09

6.  Therapy with bortezomib plus lenalidomide for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: final results of a phase II trial (CALGB 50501).

Authors:  Vicki A Morrison; Sin-Ho Jung; Jeffrey Johnson; Ann LaCasce; Kristie A Blum; Nancy L Bartlett; Brandelyn N Pitcher; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2014-08-13

7.  A phase 2 trial of extended induction epratuzumab and rituximab for previously untreated follicular lymphoma: CALGB 50701.

Authors:  Barbara W Grant; Sin-Ho Jung; Jeffrey L Johnson; Lale Kostakoglu; Eric Hsi; John C Byrd; Jeffrey Jones; John P Leonard; S Eric Martin; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  What inference for two-stage phase II trials?

Authors:  Raphaël Porcher; Kristell Desseaux
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Prospective phase II trial of pazopanib plus CapeOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) in previously untreated patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Seung Tae Kim; Jeeyun Lee; Su Jin Lee; Se Hoon Park; Sin-Ho Jung; Young Suk Park; Ho Yeong Lim; Won Ki Kang; Joon Oh Park
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-26

10.  Efficacy of intravenous iron treatment for chemotherapy-induced anemia: A prospective Phase II pilot clinical trial in South Korea.

Authors:  Jun Ho Jang; Youjin Kim; Silvia Park; Kihyun Kim; Seok Jin Kim; Won Seog Kim; Chul Won Jung; Jeeyun Lee; Se-Hoon Lee
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.