Literature DB >> 17146645

Somatosensory function following painful repetitive electrical stimulation of the human temporomandibular joint and skin.

E E Ayesh1, T S Jensen, P Svensson.   

Abstract

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are common pain problems in the population with uncertain pathophysiology and mechanisms. The aim of this experimental study was to: (1) Establish an experimental pain model using electrical stimuli to describe characteristics of nociception from the human temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and overlying skin. (2) Test the hypothesis that there would be sex-related differences in TMJ sensitivity. Forty-three healthy subjects (24 men and 19 women) participated. Using two unipolar needle electrodes into the skin (above the TMJ) in one session or into the TMJ in the other session, sensory detection threshold (SDT), pain detection threshold (PDT), and summation threshold (SumT) were measured, before and after repetitive electrical stimulation. Painful repetitive electrical stimulation was applied for 20 min with individually adjustment of the intensity of the stimuli to keep the pain rating around five on a 0-10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Sensitivity to tactile and pin-prick stimuli were assessed at 11 sites around the TMJ using two von Frey nylon filaments (5.16 and 84.96 g), as well as pressure pain threshold (PPT) and pressure pain tolerance (PPTOL) before the stimulation, after 20 min of stimulation and finally 15 min after the end of stimulation. Numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 100 was used to rate the intensity of applied von Frey filaments. SDT, PDT, and SumT were higher in the TMJ than in the skin. These three measures increased after painful repetitive stimulation for 20 min (de-sensitization). In contrast to this effect, a hypersensitivity to pin-prick stimuli was detected around the TMJ area on the stimulated side after 20 min of electrical stimulation in the TMJ, but not in the skin. A bilateral hyposensitivity to tactile stimuli was detected after skin and TMJ stimulation. PPT and PPTOL did not show a significant change over time. Except for lower TMJ PPTOLs in women than men there were no significant sex-related differences in mechanical or electrical measures. The present findings indicate differences in the elicitation of hypersensitivity following repetitive electrical stimulation of skin and deep tissues. The mechanisms underlying these findings are not clear but differences in the induction of long-term potentiation and depression is a possibility. From a clinical point of view, the lack of sex differences in most of the used measures indicates that the higher prevalence of women than men amongst patients with persistent TMJ pain problems not entirely can be ascribed to a higher sensitivity of the TMJ. Further studies will examine the somatosensory sensitivity of patients with TMJ pain problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17146645     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0801-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  39 in total

Review 1.  Learning and memory in pain pathways.

Authors:  Jürgen Sandkühler
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 2.  Human surrogate models of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Thomas Klein; Walter Magerl; Roman Rolke; Rolf-Detlef Treede
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 3.  Gender differences in pain.

Authors:  T T Dao; L LeResche
Journal:  J Orofac Pain       Date:  2000

4.  Cyclic changes in pain perception: an ROC analysis.

Authors:  P Goolkasian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-06

5.  Muscle pain inhibits cutaneous touch perception.

Authors:  Christian S Stohler; Charles J Kowalski; James P Lund
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Referred pain and hyperalgesia in human tendon and muscle belly tissue.

Authors:  William Gibson; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Thomas Graven-Nielsen
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Multi-modal induction and assessment of allodynia and hyperalgesia in the human oesophagus.

Authors:  Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Klaus-Peter Schipper; Georg Dimcevski; Poul Petersen; Ole Kaeseler Andersen; Hans Gregersen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 8.  Induction and assessment of muscle pain, referred pain, and muscular hyperalgesia.

Authors:  Thomas Graven-Nielsen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2003-12

9.  Differential modulation of remifentanil-induced analgesia and postinfusion hyperalgesia by S-ketamine and clonidine in humans.

Authors:  Wolfgang Koppert; Reinhard Sittl; Karin Scheuber; Monika Alsheimer; Martin Schmelz; Jürgen Schüttler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Central representation of muscle pain and mechanical hyperesthesia in the orofacial region: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  Ron C Kupers; Peter Svensson; Troels S Jensen
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Usefulness of the Pressure Algometer in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Orofacial Pain Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Agata Kamińska; Bartosz Dalewski; Ewa Sobolewska
Journal:  Occup Ther Int       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 1.448

2.  Conditioned pain modulation in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) pain patients.

Authors:  Yuka Oono; Kelun Wang; Lene Baad-Hansen; Simple Futarmal; Hikaru Kohase; Peter Svensson; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of local anesthetics on somatosensory function in the temporomandibular joint area.

Authors:  Emad E Ayesh; Malin Ernberg; Peter Svensson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings.

Authors:  Roger B Fillingim; Christopher D King; Margarete C Ribeiro-Dasilva; Bridgett Rahim-Williams; Joseph L Riley
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  Prediction of pain sensitivity in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Pernille Ravn; Rune Frederiksen; Anders P Skovsen; Lona L Christrup; Mads U Werner
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Dysregulation of the descending pain system in temporomandibular disorders revealed by low-frequency sensory transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: a pupillometric study.

Authors:  Annalisa Monaco; Ruggero Cattaneo; Luca Mesin; Eleonora Ortu; Mario Giannoni; Davide Pietropaoli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Catastrophizing Has a Better Prediction for TMD Than Other Psychometric and Experimental Pain Variables.

Authors:  Lisa Willassen; Anders Arne Johansson; Siv Kvinnsland; Kordian Staniszewski; Trond Berge; Annika Rosén
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.037

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.