Literature DB >> 17146039

Assessing students' ability to trace matter in dynamic systems in cell biology.

Christopher D Wilson1, Charles W Anderson, Merle Heidemann, John E Merrill, Brett W Merritt, Gail Richmond, Duncan F Sibley, Joyce M Parker.   

Abstract

College-level biology courses contain many complex processes that are often taught and learned as detailed narratives. These processes can be better understood by perceiving them as dynamic systems that are governed by common fundamental principles. Conservation of matter is such a principle, and thus tracing matter is an essential step in learning to reason about biological processes. We present here multiple-choice questions that measure students' ability and inclination to trace matter through photosynthesis and cellular respiration. Data associated with each question come from students in a large undergraduate biology course that was undergoing a shift in instructional strategy toward making fundamental principles (such as tracing matter) a central theme. We also present findings from interviews with students in the course. Our data indicate that 1) many students are not using tracing matter as a tool to reason about biological processes, 2) students have particular difficulties tracing matter between systems and have a persistent tendency to interconvert matter and energy, and 3) instructional changes seem to be effective in promoting application of the tracing matter principle. Using these items as diagnostic tools allows instructors to be proactive in addressing students' misconceptions and ineffective reasoning.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17146039      PMCID: PMC1681358          DOI: 10.1187/cbe.06-02-0142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ        ISSN: 1931-7913            Impact factor:   3.325


  1 in total

1.  Carbon flux and growth in mature deciduous forest trees exposed to elevated CO2.

Authors:  Christian Körner; Roman Asshoff; Olivier Bignucolo; Stephan Hättenschwiler; Sonja G Keel; Susanna Peláez-Riedl; Steeve Pepin; Rolf T W Siegwolf; Gerhard Zotz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 47.728

  1 in total
  32 in total

Review 1.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips.

Authors:  Jane E Caldwell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology.

Authors:  Peter Armbruster; Maya Patel; Erika Johnson; Martha Weiss
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Learning Outcomes with Linked Assessments - an Essential Part of our Regular Teaching Practice.

Authors:  Ann C Smith; Gili Marbach-Ad
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2010-12-20

4.  The problem of revealing how students think: Concept inventories and beyond.

Authors:  Julia I Smith; Kimberly Tanner
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  The development of a conceptual framework and tools to assess undergraduates' principled use of models in cellular biology.

Authors:  Gail Richmond; Brett Merritt; Mark Urban-Lurain; Joyce Parker
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  A diagnostic assessment for introductory molecular and cell biology.

Authors:  Jia Shi; William B Wood; Jennifer M Martin; Nancy A Guild; Quentin Vicens; Jennifer K Knight
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Common origins of diverse misconceptions: cognitive principles and the development of biology thinking.

Authors:  John D Coley; Kimberly D Tanner
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  The effects of the SUN project on teacher knowledge and self-efficacy regarding biological energy transfer are significant and long-lasting: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ann Finney Batiza; Mary Gruhl; Bo Zhang; Tom Harrington; Marisa Roberts; Donna LaFlamme; Mary Anne Haasch; Jonathan Knopp; Gina Vogt; David Goodsell; Eric Hagedorn; David Marcey; Mark Hoelzer; Dave Nelson
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Advantages and challenges of using physics curricula as a model for reforming an undergraduate biology course.

Authors:  D A Donovan; L J Atkins; I Y Salter; D J Gallagher; R F Kratz; J V Rousseau; G D Nelson
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  What are they thinking? Automated analysis of student writing about acid-base chemistry in introductory biology.

Authors:  Kevin C Haudek; Luanna B Prevost; Rosa A Moscarella; John Merrill; Mark Urban-Lurain
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.