Literature DB >> 17145994

Trends in acute myocardial infarction in 4 US states between 1992 and 2001: clinical characteristics, quality of care, and outcomes.

Frederick A Masoudi1, JoAnne M Foody, Edward P Havranek, Yongfei Wang, Martha J Radford, Richard M Allman, Jay Gold, R Todd Wiblin, Harlan M Krumholz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because of the health impact of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), substantial resources have been dedicated to improving AMI care and outcomes. Long-term trends in the clinical characteristics, quality of care, and outcomes for AMI over time from the health system perspective in geographically diverse populations are not well known. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The present study included 20,550 Medicare patients aged > or = 65 years hospitalized in 4 US states (Alabama, Connecticut, Iowa, Wisconsin) with the confirmed primary discharge diagnosis of AMI in 4 periods: 1992-1993 (n=10,292), 1995 (n=5566), 1998-1999 (n=2413), and 2000-2001 (n=2279). With the use of standard quality indicator definitions, treatment of ideal candidates with aspirin and beta-blockers within 24 hours after presentation, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at discharge was assessed. Multivariable models were constructed to calculate adjusted 1-year mortality. The hospitalized Medicare population with AMI changed substantially during 1992-2001, with increasing age, more comorbidity, and fewer meeting ideal treatment criteria. Although treatment rates increased significantly for all medications, aspirin, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were not provided at discharge to 12.6%, 19.7%, and 25.2% of ideal candidates, respectively, in 2000-2001. Crude 1-year mortality increased (27.6%, 28.3%, 30.6%, and 31.0%; P=0.003 for trend, but adjusted mortality declined (compared with 1992-1993, relative risk in 1995=0.94 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.01]; relative risk in 1998-1999=0.91 [95% CI, 0.85 to 0.98]; relative risk in 2000-2001=0.87 [95% CI, 0.81 to 0.94]).
CONCLUSIONS: The quality of care and adjusted 1-year mortality improved significantly for Medicare beneficiaries with AMI during 1992-2001. Nevertheless, fewer were ideal for guideline-based therapy, and absolute mortality remains high, suggesting the need for treatment strategies applicable to a broader range of older patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17145994     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.611707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  25 in total

1.  Who is missing from the measures? Trends in the proportion and treatment of patients potentially excluded from publicly reported quality measures.

Authors:  Susannah M Bernheim; Yongfei Wang; Elizabeth H Bradley; Frederick A Masoudi; Saif S Rathore; Joseph S Ross; Elizabeth Drye; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Trends in postacute myocardial infarction management and mortality in patients with diabetes. A population-based study from 1995 to 2001.

Authors:  Najwa Ouhoummane; Belkacem Abdous; Rabia Louchini; Louis Rochette; Paul Poirier
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Declining length of stay for patients hospitalized with AMI: impact on mortality and readmissions.

Authors:  Jane S Saczynski; Darleen Lessard; Frederick A Spencer; Jerry H Gurwitz; Joel M Gore; Jorge Yarzebski; Robert J Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Medication Discussion Questions (MedDQ): developing a guide to facilitate patient-clinician communication about heart medications.

Authors:  Linda Garavalia; Brian Garavalia; John A Spertus; Carole Decker
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.083

5.  Temporal trends in revascularization and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction among the very elderly.

Authors:  Maude Pagé; Michel Doucet; Mark J Eisenberg; Hassan Behlouli; Louise Pilote
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Association between myocardial infarction and fractures: an emerging phenomenon.

Authors:  Yariv Gerber; L Joseph Melton; Susan A Weston; Véronique L Roger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Changes in mortality on weekend versus weekday admissions for Acute Coronary Syndrome in the United States over the past decade.

Authors:  Mahdi Khoshchehreh; Elliott M Groves; David Tehrani; Alpesh Amin; Pranav M Patel; Shaista Malik
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  Reduction in acute myocardial infarction mortality in the United States: risk-standardized mortality rates from 1995-2006.

Authors:  Harlan M Krumholz; Yun Wang; Jersey Chen; Elizabeth E Drye; John A Spertus; Joseph S Ross; Jeptha P Curtis; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Judith H Lichtman; Edward P Havranek; Frederick A Masoudi; Martha J Radford; Lein F Han; Michael T Rapp; Barry M Straube; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Disparities in myocardial infarction case fatality rates among the elderly: the 20-year Medicare experience.

Authors:  Gregory A Wellenius; Murray A Mittleman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  National trends in heart failure hospitalization after acute myocardial infarction for Medicare beneficiaries: 1998-2010.

Authors:  Jersey Chen; Angela Fu-Chi Hsieh; Kumar Dharmarajan; Frederick A Masoudi; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.