Literature DB >> 17145390

A practical guide to meta-analysis.

Kevin C Chung1, Patricia B Burns, H Myra Kim.   

Abstract

The wealth of medical research published on a yearly basis demands methods to summarize the literature. Narrative or expert reviews were the traditional method to provide this summary; however, biases associated with narrative reviews raise questions regarding whether this process provides sufficient evidence to guide practice. Meta-analysis is becoming increasingly popular because it can combine results from similar studies to calculate an overall estimate of a treatment effect. Although meta-analysis has its limitations, a thoughtful and well-planned analysis is a valuable tool in providing a high level of evidence. We discuss the steps needed to perform a meta-analysis as a guideline for those interested in pursuing this type of research.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17145390     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  10 in total

Review 1.  Quality of Meta-Analyses for Randomized Trials in the Field of Hypertension: an Updated and Improved Systematic Review.

Authors:  George C Roush; Fiorella Perez; Ramy Abdelfattah; Andrew Prindle; Elie Jean; Tanveer Singh; John B Kostis; William J Kostis; William J Elliott; Jesse A Berlin
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Organizing a Multidisciplinary Research Team: Strategies, Execution, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer M Sterbenz; Jacob S Nasser; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  The effect of study design biases on the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting silicone breast implant ruptures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jae W Song; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Lillian T Bellfi; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Distal humeral hemiarthroplasty: indications, results, and complications. A systematic review.

Authors:  John Dunn; Nicholas Kusnezov; Miguel Pirela-Cruz
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2014-12

5.  The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions among cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  N G Xunlin; Ying Lau; Piyanee Klainin-Yobas
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Fundamental principles of conducting a surgery economic analysis study.

Authors:  Sandra V Kotsis; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Quality of life in young and middle age adult temporomandibular disorders patients and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lucas Bozzetti Pigozzi; Duziene Denardini Pereira; Marcos Pascoal Pattussi; Carmen Moret-Tatay; Tatiana Quarti Irigaray; João Batista Blessmann Weber; Patrícia Krieger Grossi; Márcio Lima Grossi
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Meta-analysis: the way forward in medical discovery.

Authors:  J O Akinyemi
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2008-06

Review 9.  PNPLA3 rs738409 Polymorphism Associated with Hepatic Steatosis and Advanced Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Hao Fan; Ming-Que Xiang; Qing-Ling Li; Hong-Tao Shi; Jin-Jun Guo
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 4.519

10.  Predicting Crashes Using Traffic Offences. A Meta-Analysis that Examines Potential Bias between Self-Report and Archival Data.

Authors:  Peter Barraclough; Anders Af Wåhlberg; James Freeman; Barry Watson; Angela Watson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.